Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.

Uri Keich1, Attila Kertesz-Farkas2, William Stafford Noble2,3

  • 1†School of Mathematics and Statistics F07, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

Journal of Proteome Research
|July 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:33

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

8.1K
Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is an analytical technique that employs two mass analyzers. Essentially it is a series of mass spectrometers that helps isolate a particular biomolecule and then helps study its chemical properties.
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
8.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Label-Free Quantification in the Crux Toolkit.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Prioritizing peptides for targeted mass spectrometry experiments using deep learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Embryo-scale Visual Cell Sorting reveals a conserved transcriptomic signature of nucleolar size linked to proteostasis.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Prediction and functional interpretation of inter-chromosomal genome architecture from DNA sequence with TwinC.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Benchmarking Hi-C scaffolders using reference genomes and de novo assemblies.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Unified imputation of missing data modalities and features in multi-omic data via shared representation learning.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Accurate statistical confidence estimation is vital for shotgun proteomics. This study introduces the mix-max procedure for unbiased false discovery rate (FDR) estimation, improving upon existing target-decoy methods.

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Shotgun proteomics generates numerous hypotheses requiring statistical confidence estimates for identified tandem mass spectra.
  • Current methods for estimating false discovery rate (FDR) lack scientific consensus, impacting high-throughput proteomics data interpretation.
  • Existing protocols, including target-decoy competition (TDC) and separate target-decoy searches, have limitations in accuracy and data retention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the accuracy of existing FDR estimation protocols in proteomics.
  • To identify biases and limitations in current target-decoy strategies for mass spectrometry data.
  • To propose a novel, unbiased method for FDR estimation in proteomics.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
false discovery ratemass spectrometryspectrum identification

Related Experiment Videos

  • Theoretical and empirical analysis of four established FDR estimation protocols.
  • Evaluation of two variants of the target-decoy competition (TDC) protocol.
  • Assessment of two variants of the separate target-decoy search protocol.
  • Development and validation of the proposed mix-max procedure.
  • Main Results:

    • Significant biases were identified in the separate target-decoy search protocols.
    • The most accurate TDC protocol resulted in the forfeiture of high-scoring spectrum identifications.
    • The proposed mix-max procedure demonstrated unbiased and accurate FDR estimation.
    • The mix-max procedure avoids biases of separate searches and data loss from TDC.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing FDR estimation methods in proteomics have inherent biases and limitations.
    • The novel mix-max procedure offers an unbiased and accurate approach to FDR estimation.
    • This method improves confidence in identified tandem mass spectra, enhancing proteomics data reliability.