Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning
Published on: January 19, 2022
Evaluation of the SIGNIFY trial
1Clinica Medica, University of Milano Bicocca and Istituto di Ricerche e Cura a Caratttere Scientifico IRCCS Multimedica , Sesto San Giovanni, Milan , Italy guido.grassi@unimib.it.
Insights
The Ivabradine In Coronary Heart Disease (SIGNIFY) trial found no overall benefit for ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease. However, it increased risks in patients with angina, suggesting limited clinical benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Heart rate reduction is a potential therapeutic strategy for coronary artery disease (CAD).
- The If inhibitor ivabradine targets heart rate reduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cardiovascular benefits and safety of ivabradine in patients with stable CAD and heart rate ≥ 70 bpm.
Main Methods:
- The Study Assessing the Morbidity-Mortality Benefits of the If Inhibitor, Ivabradine, in patients with coronary artery disease (SIGNIFY) trial enrolled 19,102 patients.
- Patients received ivabradine (5-10 mg bid) or placebo, in addition to standard treatment.
- The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction over a mean follow-up of 2.3 years.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the primary endpoint was observed between the ivabradine and placebo groups (6.8% vs 6.4%, p=NS).
- In patients with angina (class II or higher), ivabradine significantly increased the primary endpoint incidence (7.6% vs 6.5%, p < 0.02).
- Increased incidence of bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, and Q-T prolongation was noted with ivabradine.
Conclusions:
- The SIGNIFY trial does not support the routine clinical use of ivabradine for improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
- Ivabradine may increase risks in specific patient subgroups, particularly those with angina.
Abstract:
A reduction in the heart rate has been thought to be beneficial in coronary artery disease. The study assessing the morbidity-mortality Benefits of the If Inhibitor, Ivabradine, in patients with coronary artery disease (SIGNIFY) tested this hypothesis. It specifically evaluated the effects of ivabradine, administered at the dosage of 5 - 10 mg/bid in addition to current drug treatment, on cardiovascular outcome in 19102 patients with heart rate ≥ 70 bpm in normal sinus rhythm and stable coronary artery disease without heart failure. The primary endpoint of the trial, whose follow-up averaged for 2.3 years, was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes or nonfatal myocardial infarction whereas the secondary endpoint was represented by the primary endpoint plus total mortality. The incidence of the primary endpoint was at the study end similar in the ivabradine-treated and in the placebo-treated group (6.8 vs 6.4%, p = NS). Superimposable was also the incidence of death for cardiovascular events and for nonfatal myocardial infarction. However, in the 12049 patients with angina class II or higher ivabradine significantly increased the incidence of primary endpoint as compared to placebo (7.6 vs 6.5%, p < 0.02). This was associated with a significantly greater incidence of bradycardia, atrial fibrillation and Q-T prolongation. Taken together the results of the SIGNIFY do not support the clinical benefits of ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to the Sign Test
Significance Testing: Overview
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
Statistical Significance
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Sign Test for Nominal Data
For example, consider a...

