Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

421
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
421
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

55.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
55.9K
Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen01:14

Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen

891
A device engineer plays a crucial role in designing user interfaces for mobile devices. One such interface is the resistive touchscreen, which fundamentally consists of two metallic layers: a flexible upper layer and a rigid lower layer, separated by a narrow gap. The high resistance between these two layers is a key characteristic of this design.
When a user touches the screen, the two layers make contact at a specific point known as the touchpoint. This contact reduces the resistance between...
891
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.1K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

972
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
972

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wearable Technology Hesitancy in Industrial Applications.

IISE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors·2025
Same author

Effects of an Auditory Versus Visual Stimulus on Reaction and Response Time During Countermovement Jumps.

Perceptual and motor skills·2024
Same author

Effects of a Strength and Conditioning Offseason Program on Countermovement Jump Ground Reaction Forces in Division I American Football Players.

Journal of strength and conditioning research·2023
Same author

Quick on Your Feet: Modifying the Star Excursion Balance Test with a Cognitive Motor Response Time Task.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2023
Same author

Impact of Sub-Clinical and Clinical Compression Socks on Postural Stability Tasks among Individuals with Ankle Instability.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Do They Really Work? Quantifying Fabric Mask Effectiveness to Improve Public Health Messaging.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.6K

Evaluating change in user error when using ruggedized handheld devices.

Angela Brooke Cannon1, Lesley Strawderman1, Reuben Burch1

  • 1Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 9542 Mississippi State, MS 39562, United States.

Applied Ergonomics
|July 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

User age and input type affect errors on rugged handheld devices. Touchscreen devices are optimal for minimizing user errors during data entry tasks, enhancing workplace efficiency.

Keywords:
GenerationHandheld devicesUser error

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students
12:51

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students

Published on: June 16, 2018

8.0K
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
05:51

Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health

Published on: February 21, 2025

1.6K
Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students
12:51

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students

Published on: June 16, 2018

8.0K
Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
06:49

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

Published on: December 11, 2015

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Usability Engineering
  • Mobile Device Technology

Background:

  • Growing reliance on handheld mobile devices in professional settings necessitates understanding user interaction.
  • Assessing user error patterns is crucial for optimizing device design and usability.
  • Ruggedized handheld devices are increasingly common in demanding work environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of user age on data entry errors.
  • To determine how input content type influences error rates.
  • To compare user error performance between physical keypad and touchscreen interfaces on ruggedized devices.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed word and character data entry tasks on both physical keypad and touchscreen ruggedized handheld devices.
  • User errors, including corrected and permanent types, were systematically recorded and analyzed.
  • Data analysis focused on variations in error occurrence related to participant age and input method.

Main Results:

  • Touchscreen devices demonstrated significantly lower overall user error rates compared to physical keypad devices.
  • Specific age-related differences in error patterns were observed, though touchscreen performance remained superior.
  • The type of input content (words vs. characters) also influenced error frequency, with nuances between device types.

Conclusions:

  • Touchscreen interfaces are the preferred ruggedized handheld device for minimizing user error in workplace data entry.
  • Optimizing device selection based on user demographics and task requirements can enhance productivity and reduce errors.
  • Further research into age-specific interaction design for mobile devices is warranted.