Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Symptom-Only Localization of Brainstem Ischemia Using Large Language Models Versus Neurologists in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Positive Cases: Retrospective Single-Center Study.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Radiologists' memory as a data protection risk: a worst-case stress test for chest radiograph re-identification.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same author

Towards an accessible, centralised, searchable database for AI courses in Europe: the Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Education (AIMIROE) project.

European radiology experimental·2026
Same author

Multi-institutional classification of fibroglandular tissue and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI using deep learning.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2026
Same author

Commercial AI for CT lung cancer screening: product capabilities, coverage of nodule management tasks and supporting evidence.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Challenges underlying radiology's research problem.

Insights into imaging·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
12:08

From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data

Published on: August 13, 2014

25.1K

On the evaluation of segmentation editing tools.

Frank Heckel1, Jan H Moltz2, Hans Meine2

  • 1Fraunhofer MEVIS , Universitaetsallee 29, 28357 Bremen, Germany ; University of Leipzig , Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|July 10, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Evaluating segmentation editing tools for medical imaging is crucial. This study introduces new methods for objective assessment, combining user feedback with automated analysis for improved accuracy and efficiency in tumor segmentation.

Keywords:
automationevaluationinteractive segmentationsegmentation editingsimulationvalidation

More Related Videos

SCAnED - An Open-source Skin Segmentation Macro for Semi-automated Cell and Nuclei Detection in Epidermal and Dermal Skin Compartments
06:34

SCAnED - An Open-source Skin Segmentation Macro for Semi-automated Cell and Nuclei Detection in Epidermal and Dermal Skin Compartments

Published on: August 8, 2025

673
Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench
11:38

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench

Published on: August 23, 2017

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data
12:08

From Voxels to Knowledge: A Practical Guide to the Segmentation of Complex Electron Microscopy 3D-Data

Published on: August 13, 2014

25.1K
SCAnED - An Open-source Skin Segmentation Macro for Semi-automated Cell and Nuclei Detection in Epidermal and Dermal Skin Compartments
06:34

SCAnED - An Open-source Skin Segmentation Macro for Semi-automated Cell and Nuclei Detection in Epidermal and Dermal Skin Compartments

Published on: August 8, 2025

673
Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench
11:38

Volume Segmentation and Analysis of Biological Materials Using SuRVoS Super-region Volume Segmentation Workbench

Published on: August 23, 2017

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Computer-Aided Diagnosis
  • Image Segmentation

Background:

  • Automatic segmentation methods often yield insufficient results, necessitating manual editing tools.
  • Evaluating segmentation editing tools is subjective and lacks objective, comprehensive methods, especially regarding intermediate results.
  • Tumor segmentation in computed tomography (CT) presents unique challenges for editing tool evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop objective methods for evaluating segmentation editing tools, addressing the limitations of subjective user impressions.
  • To propose a rating scheme for qualitative assessment of accuracy and efficiency in user studies.
  • To introduce quantitative scores and a simulation-based approach for reproducible, automated evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • A qualitative rating scheme was designed to measure accuracy and efficiency during user studies.
  • Two objective scores were developed, integrating subjective ratings with quantified segmentation quality over time.
  • A simulation-based evaluation approach was proposed for reproducible, automated assessment without human input.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods were applied to evaluate two editing algorithms on 131 tumor segmentations.
  • The study demonstrated how the new methods enhance the comparison and evaluation of segmentation editing algorithms.
  • A strong correlation was observed between the proposed quantitative quality score and qualitative user ratings.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods provide a more objective and comprehensive approach to evaluating segmentation editing tools.
  • Automated evaluation complements user studies, proving particularly valuable during the development phase.
  • The findings facilitate more convincing and reproducible assessments of segmentation editing algorithm performance.