Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

05:22
Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
Published on: August 11, 2023
3.0K
Simulator training for endobronchial ultrasound: a randomised controlled trial
Lars Konge1, Paul Frost Clementsen2, Charlotte Ringsted3
1Centre for Clinical Education, University of Copenhagen and The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark lkonge@yahoo.dk.
The European Respiratory Journal
|July 11, 2015
Summary
Virtual-reality simulator training improves endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) skills more effectively than traditional training. A new assessment tool (EBUSAT) reliably measures EBUS-TBNA competence.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology
- Medical Education
- Medical Simulation
Background:
- Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) requires extensive training due to its operator-dependent nature and steep learning curve.
- Simulation-based training offers a potential solution to accelerate skill acquisition and ensure proficiency.
- A validated assessment tool is crucial for certifying competency before independent EBUS-TBNA performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of virtual-reality (VR) simulator training compared to traditional apprenticeship for EBUS-TBNA.
- To assess the validity and reliability of a newly developed Endobronchial Ultrasound Assessment Tool (EBUSAT) for EBUS-TBNA competence.
Main Methods:
- 16 novice respiratory physicians were randomized to VR simulator training or traditional patient-based apprenticeship.
- All participants performed three EBUS-TBNA procedures on patients, recorded for assessment.
- Procedures were evaluated by three independent assessors using the EBUSAT, assessing internal consistency, generalizability, and discriminatory ability.
Main Results:
- The EBUSAT demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.95) and good generalizability (0.86).
- Simulator-trained novices achieved significantly higher EBUSAT scores (24.2±7.9) than apprenticeship-trained novices (20.2±9.4; p=0.006).
- A pass/fail threshold (28.9 points) revealed higher failure rates for apprenticeship-trained novices (83%) versus simulator-trained novices (67%; p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- The EBUSAT provides a reliable and valid method for assessing EBUS-TBNA competence and can aid in certification.
- Virtual-reality simulator training is more effective than traditional apprenticeship in improving EBUS-TBNA skills for novices.
- VR simulation represents a promising approach to expedite the learning curve for EBUS-TBNA procedures.

