Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

19.3K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
19.3K
Bias01:22

Bias

8.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Respiratory syncytial viral load drives ciliated cell dedifferentiation and suppresses antiviral immunity.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Analysis and visualization of expression patterns with fuzzy sets as FlowSets.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Divergent granulopoiesis at extramedullary sites safeguards antibacterial host defense.

Science immunology·2026
Same author

Exonuclease ISG20 inhibits human cytomegalovirus replication by inducing an innate immune defense signature.

PLoS pathogens·2026
Same author

Single-cell RNA-seq using UltraMarathonRT expands the known transcriptome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

mRNA turnover dynamics are affected by cell differentiation and loss of the cytosine methyltransferase Nsun2.

Nucleic acids research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

1.1K

Count ratio model reveals bias affecting NGS fold changes.

Florian Erhard1, Ralf Zimmer2

  • 1Institut für Informatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Amalienstraße 17, 80333 München, Germany Florian.Erhard@bio.ifi.lmu.de.

Nucleic Acids Research
|July 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Biases in RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) read counts impact gene expression analysis. This study introduces a novel probabilistic method to accurately estimate fold changes, improving biological interpretation and outperforming existing normalization techniques.

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs
08:49

Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs

Published on: September 16, 2019

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method
08:53

Strand-Specific Analysis of Proteins at Replicating DNA Strands by Enrichment and Sequencing of Protein-Associated Nascent DNA Method

Published on: May 2, 2025

1.1K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs
08:49

Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs

Published on: September 16, 2019

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • High-throughput sequencing, particularly RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), is susceptible to various biases affecting read counts.
  • These biases can persist even when calculating fold changes, leading to inaccurate identification of differentially expressed genes and impacting biological interpretation.
  • Existing normalization methods may not fully address these biases, compromising the reliability of RNA-seq results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational approach for more accurate estimation of fold changes in RNA-seq data.
  • To provide a robust method that accounts for biases in read counts and improves the biological interpretation of differential gene expression.
  • To introduce a probabilistic model that offers a theoretical foundation for pseudo-counts and fold change credible intervals.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a probabilistic model that directly incorporates count ratios, rather than raw read counts.
  • Estimation of normalization factors using the proposed probabilistic model.
  • Validation of the method by comparing RNA-seq derived fold changes against quantitative PCR (qPCR) data from the MAQC/SEQC project.
  • Analysis of random barcoded sequencing data to further assess the method's performance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method significantly improves fold change estimates compared to existing approaches.
  • Bias in RNA-seq read counts does not always cancel out during fold change computation, affecting over 20% of differentially regulated genes.
  • The novel normalization factors derived from the probabilistic model outperform currently used methods.
  • The method provides accurate fold change credible intervals.

Conclusions:

  • The novel probabilistic approach offers a more reliable method for estimating fold changes in RNA-seq experiments.
  • Accurate fold change estimation is crucial for correct biological interpretation and identifying true differentially expressed genes.
  • This method addresses a critical limitation in RNA-seq data analysis, enhancing the accuracy and trustworthiness of genomic studies.