Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.2K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.2K
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

5.9K
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R...
5.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence of allocentric spatial learning in male rats with large lesions of the hippocampus.

PloS one·2026
Same author

The Influence of Posture on Attention.

Experimental psychology·2023
Same author

Does Posture Influence the Stroop Effect?

Psychological science·2020
Same author

Physically attractive faces attract us physically.

Cognition·2020
Same author

The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting.

NPJ science of learning·2019
Same author

Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children.

PeerJ·2018
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K

Understanding the relationship between implicit and explicit change detection: Evidence from scan path data.

Michael G Reynolds1, Kristen Withers2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Trent University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|July 14, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Unattended changes can capture attention, even before we consciously see them. This study shows that large visual changes attract focus faster than small ones, guiding our attention.

More Related Videos

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

14.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.8K
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

14.1K
Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Attention Studies

Background:

  • Evidence suggests visual changes are detectable outside of focal attention.
  • The link between implicit and explicit change detection remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if unattended visual changes can attract focal attention.
  • To examine the relationship between implicit and explicit change detection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the flicker task (Rensink et al., 1997) with varying change magnitudes (large vs. small).
  • Analyzed search slopes (response time vs. number of distractors) to assess attention.
  • Measured fixation times relative to change detection.

Main Results:

  • Search slopes were shallower for larger changes compared to smaller changes.
  • This difference in search slope occurred before the changing item was fixated.
  • The effect was not observed between initial fixation and response.

Conclusions:

  • Unattended visual changes can automatically attract focal attention.
  • The visual system may prioritize processing of larger, more salient changes.
  • This supports a model where implicit change detection guides explicit attention.