Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

596
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
596
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.8K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.1K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

25.1K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
25.1K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

17.4K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
17.4K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

7.1K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
7.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experience of Responding to Imaginative Suggestions: A Micro-Phenomenological Interview Exploratory Study.

The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis·2026
Same author

Studying unconscious processing: Contention and consensus.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Bayes factors for logistic (mixed-effect) models.

Psychological methods·2024
Same author

Use one system for all results to avoid contradiction: Advice for using significance tests, equivalence tests, and Bayes factors.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2024
Same author

Beyond kindness: a proposal for the flourishing of science and scientists alike.

Royal Society open science·2023
Same author

The credibility crisis and democratic governance: how to reform university governance to be compatible with the nature of science.

Royal Society open science·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.3K

Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?

Zoltan Dienes1

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom dienes@sussex.ac.uk.

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|July 14, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Significance testing and Bayesian inference are often confused, leading to irrational statistical practices. This study clarifies their differences and demonstrates practical Bayesian methods for more coherent data interpretation.

Keywords:
Bayesevidencelikelihood principlesignificance testingstatistical inference

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychology
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Researchers frequently misinterpret significance tests due to confusion with Bayesian inference.
  • This confusion can lead to irrational statistical decision-making and flawed conclusions.
  • Existing statistical approaches often struggle with interpreting nonsignificant results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clearly separate significance testing and Bayesian inference.
  • To illustrate common scenarios where these two approaches yield different conclusions.
  • To provide practical guidance on applying Bayesian inference for improved data interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of significance testing and Bayesian inference in various research contexts.
  • Examination of situations like multiple testing and participant recruitment.
  • Demonstration of Bayesian inference application using free online software.

Main Results:

  • Significance testing and Bayesian inference offer distinct conclusions in multiple testing and sequential analysis.
  • Bayesian methods provide a clearer framework for interpreting nonsignificant findings.
  • The study highlights potential irrationality in traditional statistical applications.

Conclusions:

  • Separating significance testing from Bayesian inference is crucial for rational statistical practice.
  • Bayesian inference offers a more coherent approach to data interpretation, especially for nonsignificant results.
  • Practical application of Bayesian methods can enhance the validity of research findings.