Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Bias01:22

Bias

8.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.0K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

96.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
96.0K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

347
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
347
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.4K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The perils of perceived power: The dual-threat model of antisemitism.

The American psychologist·2026
Same author

The role of state social service spending in moderating mental health outcomes of community violence: A spatial meta-analysis.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same author

Belief in a diversity-meritocracy trade-off.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Implicit bias attribution reduces prosocial emotions and donation intentions for natural disaster victims.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

U.S. Adults Believe That "Children" Are Color-Evasive and "Black Children" Process Race Early.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

Availability of community resources reduces the association among community violence exposure, negative emotionality, and substance use disorders.

Child abuse & neglect·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K

Rethinking the Baseline in Diversity Research: Should We Be Explaining the Effects of Homogeneity?

Evan P Apfelbaum1, Katherine W Phillips2, Jennifer A Richeson3

  • 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology epa1@mit.edu.

Perspectives on Psychological Science : a Journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|July 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Homogeneity, not just diversity, has independent effects on group function. Diverse groups often yield more objective and accurate responses than homogeneous ones, challenging traditional research baselines.

Keywords:
baselinediversitygroupshomogeneity

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

19.5K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Group Dynamics
  • Organizational Behavior

Background:

  • Scientific statements on group diversity's functional value are challenging.
  • Research often interprets outcomes solely as diversity effects, using homogeneous groups as a baseline.
  • This conventional approach may overlook independent effects of homogeneity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a new perspective on group diversity research.
  • To highlight the independent effects of group homogeneity.
  • To re-evaluate the objectivity and accuracy of responses in homogeneous versus diverse groups.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and theoretical analysis of group diversity and homogeneity.
  • Examination of existing studies comparing diverse and homogeneous groups.
  • Proposing two key propositions regarding homogeneity's effects.

Main Results:

  • Homogeneity exerts independent effects, sometimes comparable to diversity's impact.
  • Subjective responses in homogeneous groups may be less objective or accurate than in diverse groups.
  • Diversity research might inadvertently illuminate the effects of homogeneity.

Conclusions:

  • Homogeneity should be considered an independent variable, not just a baseline.
  • Diverse groups may offer more reliable subjective responses.
  • Future research should explore the independent contributions of homogeneity to group outcomes.