Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

688
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
688
First Impression01:09

First Impression

363
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
363
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.6K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.6K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

481
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
481
Bias01:22

Bias

8.0K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
8.0K
False Memories01:18

False Memories

654
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
654

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

When scientific sources fail to convince: evidence-oriented thinking enhances the effectiveness of science-based corrections.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of an online vaccine misinformation game for Arabic-speaking Australians: a randomized controlled trial.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

The architecture of the internet creates risks for democracy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Implementing psychology-based empathetic refutational interview training to support vaccine confident conversations for health workers.

Public health·2026
Same author

Estimating the age distribution of disease-causal HPV infection in women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Denmark, Estonia, Norway, Slovenia, and Sweden: A modeling study.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.4K

Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.

Stephan Lewandowsky1, Ullrich K H Ecker2, Colleen M Seifert3

  • 1University of Western Australia stephan.lewandowsky@uwa.edu.au.

Psychological Science in the Public Interest : a Journal of the American Psychological Society
|July 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Misinformation, like vaccine myths, spreads easily and is hard to correct due to cognitive factors. Effective debunking strategies, grounded in psychological theory, are crucial for public health and science communication.

Keywords:
debiasingfalse beliefsmemory updatingmisinformation

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

40.7K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.4K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

40.7K
Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Public Health Communication
  • Information Science

Background:

  • Misinformation, such as the false link between vaccines and autism, is a significant public concern with detrimental health and economic consequences.
  • The spread of misinformation is facilitated by various sources and amplified by the evolving media landscape, including the internet.
  • Cognitive factors significantly influence how individuals process and retain misinformation, often making it resistant to correction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the mechanisms of misinformation dissemination.
  • To review cognitive factors influencing belief in and memory of misinformation.
  • To identify and recommend effective debiasing techniques and debunking strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of misinformation dissemination mechanisms across societal levels.
  • Review of cognitive psychological theories on belief formation and memory updating.
  • Evaluation of factors influencing the effectiveness of misinformation correction.

Main Results:

  • Misinformation originates from diverse sources and is amplified by digital media.
  • Cognitive biases and memory processes contribute to the persistence of misinformation, sometimes leading to backfire effects.
  • Specific debiasing techniques, informed by cognitive psychology, can effectively reduce misbelief.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding cognitive vulnerabilities is key to combating misinformation.
  • Effective debunking requires carefully designed, structured, and applied corrections.
  • Practitioners in journalism, health, education, and science communication can utilize these evidence-based strategies to improve public understanding and trust.