Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

Imaging In-Stent Restenosis: An Inexpensive, Reliable, and Rapid Preclinical Model
Published on: September 14, 2009
In vivo Evaluation of Cenderitide-Eluting Stent (CES) II
Yingying Huang1, Xu Wen Ng2, Soon Ghim Lim2
1School of Materials Science & Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Block N4.1-02-06 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore. yingyinghuang@ntu.edu.sg.
Cenderitide-eluting stents (CES) showed improved endothelial coverage and reduced inflammation in pigs. However, CES did not significantly reduce neointimal area or stenosis compared to bare metal stents after 28 days.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cardiovascular Research
- Drug Delivery Systems
Background:
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis but delay endothelialization, requiring prolonged anti-thrombotic therapy.
- Cenderitide (CD-NP) is a novel anti-proliferative peptide that inhibits smooth muscle cells more than endothelial cells in vitro.
- Developing effective stent coatings is crucial for improving cardiovascular outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vivo efficacy of cenderitide-eluting stents (CES) in preventing in-stent restenosis (ISR) and promoting endothelialization.
- To assess the safety and drug release profile of CES in a porcine model.
- To compare CES performance against bare metal stents (BMS) and polymer-coated stents.
Main Methods:
- CES were fabricated by coating bare metal stents with CD-NP in poly(ε-caprolactone) using ultrasonic spray coating.
- 32 CES were implanted in 16 pigs, with survival assessed over 28 days.
- Plasma CD-NP levels, endothelial coverage (SEM), and histological parameters (inflammation, fibrin, neointimal area) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Plasma CD-NP levels were significantly higher in the CES group post-stenting, confirming in vivo drug release.
- SEM analysis revealed significantly greater endothelial coverage on CES compared to controls.
- Histological examination showed mild inflammation and low fibrin scores in the CES group at 28 days.
Conclusions:
- Cenderitide-eluting stents demonstrate enhanced endothelialization and reduced inflammation in a porcine model.
- Despite improved healing, CES did not significantly reduce neointimal area or stenosis compared to BMS at 28 days.
- Further investigation is needed to optimize CES for improved anti-restenotic efficacy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

