Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

15.6K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.6K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.8K
3.8K
Variation01:19

Variation

8.3K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
8.3K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

16.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
16.2K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

946
946

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expectation Modulates Hedonic Experiences and Midbrain Responses to Sweet Flavor.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscienceยท2026
Same author

Value coding by primate amygdala neurons complies with the continuity axiom of economic choice theory.

Journal of neurophysiologyยท2026
Same author

Full dopamine coding of basic economic subjective value: Utility and weighted probability.

Cell reportsยท2026
Same author

The joint estimation of uncertainty and its relationship with psychotic-like traits and psychometric schizotypy.

Npj mental health researchยท2025
Same author

Fluorescence detection of dopamine signaling to the primate striatum in relation to stimulus-reward associations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaยท2025
Same author

Social Risk Coding by Amygdala Activity and Connectivity with the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscienceยท2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 7, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

Scaling prediction errors to reward variability benefits error-driven learning in humans.

Kelly M J Diederen1, Wolfram Schultz2

  • 1Department of Physiology, Development, and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom k.diederen@gmail.com.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|July 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Individuals adapt learning to reward variability by rescaling prediction errors, enhancing accuracy. Efficient adaptation improves learning robustness, but over-scaling impairs performance.

Keywords:
adaptationprobability distributionreinforcement learningriskstandard deviation

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 7, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Reinforcement Learning

Background:

  • Effective error-driven learning necessitates adaptation to environmental reward variability.
  • Previous research indicated learning rate decay as a key adaptive mechanism.
  • The role of reward prediction error (RPE) scaling in this adaptation remained less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of RPE scaling on learning performance.
  • To examine how individuals adjust learning based on varying reward probabilities and standard deviations.
  • To determine the relationship between RPE scaling and accuracy in predicting reward means.

Main Methods:

  • Participants explicitly predicted reward magnitudes from distributions with varying standard deviations.
  • Reinforcement learning models were fitted to participant data.
  • Learning rate decay and RPE scaling were analyzed in relation to prediction accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Data analysis revealed significant scaling of RPEs, alongside previously observed learning rate decay.
  • RPE scaling strongly correlated with individual learning performance (prediction accuracy).
  • Participants scaling RPEs relative to standard deviation showed consistent performance across different variability levels, unlike those with exaggerated scaling.

Conclusions:

  • RPE scaling is a crucial adaptive mechanism in error-driven learning, complementing learning rate decay.
  • Efficient RPE scaling enhances learning robustness to environmental reward variability.
  • Exaggerated RPE scaling can lead to impaired learning performance, highlighting the importance of appropriate adaptation.