Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Multiple Family Groups to reduce child disruptive behavior difficulties: moderating effects of child welfare status
Geetha Gopalan1, Latoya Small2, Ashley Fuss3
1School of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD 21230, USA.
Insights
Multiple Family Group (MFG) therapy effectively reduces disruptive behavior in children, even those with child welfare (CW) involvement. This engaging intervention shows similar positive outcomes for families with and without CW histories.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Family Therapy
- Social Work
Background:
- Children remaining home after child welfare involvement often exhibit behavioral difficulties, increasing risks for maltreatment.
- Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBDs) in youth require effective interventions to prevent negative long-term outcomes.
- Multiple Family Group (MFG) models show promise for engaging disadvantaged families and improving child behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore if child behavioral outcomes differ for families with child welfare (CW) involvement using the MFG model compared to other families.
- To assess the effectiveness of MFG for youth with Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBDs) in families with and without a history of CW services.
- To determine if CW involvement impacts the success of MFG interventions for child behavior.
Main Methods:
- An exploratory study used a block comparison design, assigning youth (aged 7-11) and families to MFG or services as usual (SAU).
- Caregivers reported on child behavior, social skills, and functional impairment across four assessment points: baseline, mid-test, post-test, and 6-month follow-up.
- Mixed effects regression modeled multilevel outcomes to analyze treatment effects between MFG and SAU groups, comparing CW-involved and non-CW-involved families.
Main Results:
- Among families with child welfare (CW) involvement, MFG participants showed significantly reduced oppositional defiant disorder symptoms at 6-month follow-up compared to SAU.
- No significant differences were found in the effectiveness of MFG treatment between families with and without CW involvement for other measured outcomes.
- MFG demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving child behavior difficulties across both CW-involved and non-CW-involved families.
Conclusions:
- Multiple Family Group (MFG) therapy appears to be an effective intervention for reducing child behavior difficulties, regardless of a family's history with child welfare (CW) services.
- MFG's engaging and efficient nature makes it a potentially valuable service for families navigating the child welfare system.
- The findings support MFG as a viable treatment option for youth with disruptive behaviors, offering consistent benefits across diverse family backgrounds.
Abstract:
Children who remain at home with their permanent caregivers following a child welfare (CW) involvement (e.g., investigation, out-of-home placement) manifest high rates of behavioral difficulties, which is a risk factor for further maltreatment and out-of-home placement if not treated effectively. A recently tested Multiple Family Group (MFG) service delivery model to treat youth Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBDs) has demonstrated effectiveness in improving child behavior difficulties among hard-to-engage, socioeconomically disadvantaged families by addressing parenting skills, parent-child relationships, family communication and organization, social support, and stress. This exploratory study examines whether child behavioral outcomes for MFG differ for families with self-reported lifetime involvement in CW services compared to other families, as families with CW involvement struggle with additional stressors that can diminish treatment success. Youth (aged 7-11) and their families were assigned to MFG or services as usual (SAU) using a block comparison design. Caregivers reported on child behavior, social skills, and functional impairment. Mixed effects regression modeled multilevel outcomes across 4 assessment points (i.e., baseline, mid-test, post-test, 6-month follow-up). Among CW-involved families, MFG participants reported significantly reduced child oppositional defiant disorder symptoms at 6-month follow-up compared with SAU participants. No other differences were found in the effect of MFG treatment between CW and non-CW involved families. Findings suggest that MFG may be as effective in reducing child behavior difficulties for both CW and non-CW involved families. As a short-term, engaging, and efficient intervention, MFG may be a particularly salient service offering for families involved in the CW system.
More Related Videos
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
07:01Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
Published on: March 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Family Therapy
Strategic Family Therapy
Strategic family therapy emphasizes resolving communication barriers and improving problem-solving abilities...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Conduct Disorder
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Relationship with Other Adult Family Members and Siblings
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...