Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
Published on: May 1, 2020
Assisting the High Administrative Court in Restricting Too Broad a Concept of Academic Judgment
1a ISEG , University of Lisbon , Lisboa , Portugal.
Abstract:
I have received substantial monetary compensation and a formal apology from my first doctoral school, and a Ph.D. from another university. This essay describes my personal view on discussing the boundaries of academic judgment and research supervision with the ombudsman agency for higher education, and at the High Administrative Court of England and Wales. The Court's judicial doctrine addresses substantial research accountability matters. It clarifies that although the Court and ombudsman agency must not interfere with academic judgment, not everything done by an academic can be considered as academic judgment. A Ph.D. supervisor can seriously fail to perform his/her duties.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records
Limit Laws I
Limit Laws II
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
Reliability and Validity
Restriction Enzymes
The host bacteria protect their own genomic DNA from these enzymes by methylating these sites. Some...

