Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.6K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.6K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

712
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
712
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

2.3K
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
2.3K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

674
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
674

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examination of the Construct Validity of Nextiles Arm Sleeve as a Measure of Peak Elbow-Varus Torque.

Journal of athletic training·2026
Same author

Re-establishing Confidence in Confidence Intervals: An Evaluation of Recent Practices in Sport Injury Epidemiology.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

The risk of subsequent concussion in adolescent ice hockey players with ≥2 concussions.

Journal of science and medicine in sport·2026
Same author

Identification of the causal odds ratio in test negative designs.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Unifying to Advance Understanding: Collaborative, Community-Driven and 'Open' Approaches for Better Science in Sport.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

The interventionist approach can address questions related to causes of effects if causes are considered as states instead of interventions.

Observational studies·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K

Is the Risk Difference Really a More Heterogeneous Measure?

Charlie Poole1, Ian Shrier, Tyler J VanderWeele

  • 1From the aDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; bCentre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish, Montreal, QC, Canada; cGeneral Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; and dDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|July 22, 2015
PubMed
Summary

The risk difference may not be more heterogeneous than other measures. Statistical tests for homogeneity may have varying power, affecting previous conclusions about heterogeneity in meta-analyses.

More Related Videos

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

19.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.8K
Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

19.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Claims exist suggesting the risk difference is a more heterogeneous measure than odds ratios or risk ratios.
  • This is often based on meta-analysis surveys where homogeneity tests reject the null hypothesis more frequently for risk differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the empirical evidence supporting the claim that the risk difference is a more heterogeneous measure.
  • To investigate the influence of statistical power differences in homogeneity tests across different effect measure scales.

Main Methods:

  • Examined the impact of varying statistical power on homogeneity tests across different scales (risk difference, odds ratio, risk ratio).
  • Developed hypothetical examples to illustrate scenarios with equal heterogeneity but differing test rejection rates.

Main Results:

  • Homogeneity tests can exhibit different statistical power across scales, potentially biasing comparisons.
  • Hypothetical examples show risk difference tests rejecting more often, suggesting higher power, not necessarily greater heterogeneity.
  • Current empirical evidence for the risk difference being more heterogeneous is deemed unsatisfactory.

Conclusions:

  • The observed differences in homogeneity test rejections may be due to power variations, not inherent heterogeneity.
  • Further research using alternative empirical comparison methods is needed to accurately assess heterogeneity across measures.