Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

391
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
391
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.6K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

556
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
556
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods01:20

Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods

967
Pharmacodynamic methods provide insights into a drug's effects on physiological processes over time and play a crucial role in understanding bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. These methods can be broadly classified into acute pharmacological and therapeutic response approaches, each with distinct mechanisms and applications.The acute pharmacological response method directly correlates a drug's physiological effects, such as ECG or pupil diameter changes, to its time course in the body.
967

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Growing implementation scientists: NHLBI's K12 programs in heart, lung, blood, and sleep research.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Correction: Matters arising: a commentary on "Failing to succeed: advancing mechanistic understanding of implementation strategies through retrospective and prospective use of causal pathway diagrams" by Austad et al. 2025.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Applying Implementation Science Methods to Prospectively Track the Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Deprescribing Intervention for Use in a New Health System and Country.

The Permanente journal·2026
Same author

Matters arising: a commentary on "Failing to succeed: advancing mechanistic understanding of implementation strategies through retrospective and prospective use of causal pathway diagrams" by Austad et al. 2025.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

How and Under What Conditions Do Patient Portals Improve Cancer Screening Completion: A Scoping Review.

AJPM focus·2026
Same author

Results of the Pediatric Guideline Adherence and Outcomes (PEGASUS) Program Versus Usual Care Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Rethinking qualitative inquiry in implementation science: clarifying purpose, design, and rigor.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Clarifying dissemination outcomes: a taxonomy to advance dissemination science.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of a clinical practice guidelines implementability assessment tool (CPG-IAT) based on the COSMIN framework.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Embracing complexity by reducing rigidity: guiding principles for the intersection of implementation science and qualitative research.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Patterns of CDSS adoption in primary care: a cluster analysis and predictive modelling study from a stepped wedge trial.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same journal

Five years of the Implementation Research Logic Model: a citation analysis and systematic scoping review of its use in implementation research and practice.

Implementation science : IS·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K

Advancing implementation science through measure development and evaluation: a study protocol.

Cara C Lewis1,2, Bryan J Weiner3, Cameo Stanick4

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10th St., Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. lewiscc@indiana.edu.

Implementation Science : IS
|July 23, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study addresses critical measurement gaps in implementation science by developing stakeholder-driven criteria for pragmatic measures and creating reliable, valid tools for key implementation outcomes. The findings will guide future research and provide practical measurement solutions.

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Implementation Science
  • Health Services Research
  • Measurement Science

Background:

  • Measurement gaps hinder implementation science advancement.
  • Lack of stakeholder input in defining pragmatic measure qualities.
  • Limited availability and unknown psychometric properties of implementation outcome measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Establish stakeholder-driven operationalization of pragmatic measures.
  • Develop reliable and valid measures for acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
  • Identify and evaluate existing measures linked to implementation frameworks.

Main Methods:

  • Aim 1: Stakeholder interviews, Q-sort, Delphi, reliability, and validity testing.
  • Aim 2: Systematic measure development including domain delineation, item generation, and psychometric/pragmatic assessments.
  • Aim 3: Refine evidence-based assessment criteria, extract data, and rate existing measures.

Main Results:

  • Development of stakeholder-driven criteria for pragmatic measures.
  • Creation of new, validated measures for acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
  • Identification of implementation-linked measures with demonstrated psychometric and pragmatic strength.

Conclusions:

  • Study outputs will establish a measurement research agenda for implementation science.
  • Provides empirically supported measures, tools, and methods for advancing the field.
  • Aims to enhance the rigor and impact of implementation research through improved measurement.