Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Unraveling the Unseen Players in the Ocean - A Field Guide to Water Chemistry and Marine Microbiology
Published on: November 5, 2014
Measuring Compositions in Organic Depth Profiling: Results from a VAMAS Interlaboratory Study
Alexander G Shard1, Rasmus Havelund1, Steve J Spencer1
1†National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom.
A Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards (VAMAS) study found X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) accurately measured organic depth profiles. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) showed significant errors due to matrix effects, but a normalization method improved accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Surface Analysis
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Accurate compositional analysis of organic materials is crucial for advanced applications.
- Organic depth profiling techniques like XPS and ToF-SIMS are essential for characterizing layered structures.
- Interlaboratory studies are vital for assessing the reliability and comparability of analytical methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) in organic depth profiling.
- To identify sources of error and variability in compositional measurements.
- To develop recommendations for improving the accuracy and consistency of ToF-SIMS analysis.
Main Methods:
- A VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) interlaboratory study involving over 20 laboratories.
- Analysis of layered organic samples with known compositions using argon cluster ion sputtering.
- Comparison of depth profiling data obtained from XPS and ToF-SIMS.
Main Results:
- XPS analysis yielded volume fraction estimates within 0.03 of nominal values.
- ToF-SIMS analysis showed errors ranging from 0.02 to over 0.10 in volume fraction, attributed to primary ion intensity variations and matrix effects.
- Organic SIMS matrix effects were measurable, consistent across instruments, and more pronounced with larger primary and secondary ions.
Conclusions:
- XPS provides accurate compositional depth profiling for organic layered materials.
- ToF-SIMS requires compensation for matrix effects to achieve comparable accuracy.
- A simple normalization method can significantly improve ToF-SIMS accuracy, making it as reliable as XPS for volume fraction estimation.
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Air Content in Concrete
The pressure method,...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Body Water Content and Fluid Compartments
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Gravimetry: Overview
In precipitation gravimetry, the analyte is converted into a precipitate and weighed. For example, the silver content in a sample can be estimated by precipitating and...
Drug Concentrations: Measurements
Plasma...

