Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Danish Contact Dermatitis Group.

J Christophersen1, T Menné, P Tanghøj

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.

Contact Dermatitis
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Europe: follow-up on changing exposures.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2019
Same author

Sociodemographic factors do not have a large influence on adherence to topical treatment in patients with psoriasis.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same author

Use of topical antipsoriatic drugs in Denmark: a nationwide drug utilization study.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

A smartphone application supporting patients with psoriasis improves adherence to topical treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

The British journal of dermatology·2018
Same author

Factors associated with combined hand and foot eczema.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2016
Same author

Repeated monthly epicutaneous challenges with diphenylcyclopropenone result in a clinically reproducible level of contact allergy in de novo sensitized individuals.

The British journal of dermatology·2016
Same journal

Contact Allergy and Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Propylene Glycol and Related Glycols: Cosmetic Skin Sensitisers After All?

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Acrylate Copolymers/Crosspolymers in Sunscreens: Minimally Allergenic, Without Evidence of Need for Avoidance by (Meth)Acrylate-Sensitized Individuals.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

AI-Assisted Automated Two-Stage Patch Test Interpretation System Using Vision Transformer.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Use of Tralokinumab in a Hairdresser With Severe Chronic Hand Eczema and Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Cyclohexyl Diethanolamine in a Metalworking Fluid.

Contact dermatitis·2026
Same journal

Fragrance and Preservative Contact Allergens in Cosmetic and Household Cleaning Products in Turkey: Variation by Target Population, Product Type and Manufacturing Origin.

Contact dermatitis·2026
See all related articles

Individual factors like age and sex significantly influence patch test results for common allergens, except for chromate and formaldehyde. This highlights the need for statistical analysis when comparing patch test data.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Contact Dermatitis
  • Allergology

Background:

  • Clinical patch testing is crucial for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis.
  • Understanding factors influencing test outcomes is essential for accurate interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of patient-specific factors on clinical patch test outcomes.
  • To determine the significance of sex, age, atopy, test timing, and skin condition on sensitization risks.

Main Methods:

  • Multivariate statistical analysis was applied to data from 2166 patients.
  • Patch tests were conducted using the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) standard series.
  • Analysis focused on eight common allergens: nickel, fragrance-mix, cobalt, chromate, balsam of Peru, carba-mix, colophony, and formaldehyde.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Sex, age, atopy, and diseased skin significantly affected sensitization risk for most tested allergens.
  • Chromate and formaldehyde sensitization risk was not significantly influenced by these individual factors.
  • The study identified specific allergens where patient characteristics play a role in positive patch test results.

Conclusions:

  • Patch test results are influenced by individual patient factors, necessitating careful interpretation.
  • Comparing patch test data requires either stratification of patient groups or the use of multivariate statistical analysis.
  • These findings emphasize the complexity of allergic contact dermatitis diagnosis and the importance of considering patient variables.