Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions
Susie Y Huang1, Ravi T Seethamraju1, Pritesh Patel1
1From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 (S.Y.H., P.F.H., A.R.G.); Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Mass (S.Y.H., A.R.G.);Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (P.P.); and Siemens Healthcare USA, Malvern, Pa (R.T.S., J.E.K.).
Abstract:
Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is challenging because of the complex interaction of multiple factors, including motion arising from respiration and bowel peristalsis, susceptibility effects secondary to bowel gas, and the need to cover a large field of view. The combination of these factors makes body MR imaging more prone to artifacts, compared with imaging of other anatomic regions. Understanding the basic MR physics underlying artifacts is crucial to recognizing the trade-offs involved in mitigating artifacts and improving image quality. Artifacts can be classified into three main groups: (a) artifacts related to magnetic field imperfections, including the static magnetic field, the radiofrequency (RF) field, and gradient fields; (b) artifacts related to motion; and (c) artifacts arising from methods used to sample the MR signal. Static magnetic field homogeneity is essential for many MR techniques, such as fat saturation and balanced steady-state free precession. Susceptibility effects become more pronounced at higher field strengths and can be ameliorated by using spin-echo sequences when possible, increasing the receiver bandwidth, and aligning the phase-encoding gradient with the strongest susceptibility gradients, among other strategies. Nonuniformities in the RF transmit field, including dielectric effects, can be minimized by applying dielectric pads or imaging at lower field strength. Motion artifacts can be overcome through respiratory synchronization, alternative k-space sampling schemes, and parallel imaging. Aliasing and truncation artifacts derive from limitations in digital sampling of the MR signal and can be rectified by adjusting the sampling parameters. Understanding the causes of artifacts and their possible solutions will enable practitioners of body MR imaging to meet the challenges of novel pulse sequence design, parallel imaging, and increasing field strength.
Insights
Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging faces challenges from motion and magnetic field imperfections, leading to artifacts. Understanding MR physics helps mitigate these issues for improved image quality in body imaging.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Biophysics
- Radiology
Background:
- Body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is complex due to motion, susceptibility effects from bowel gas, and large field-of-view requirements.
- These factors increase susceptibility to artifacts compared to other anatomical regions.
- Understanding the underlying MR physics is crucial for artifact mitigation and image quality improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To classify and explain common artifacts in body MR imaging.
- To discuss strategies for mitigating artifacts arising from magnetic field imperfections, motion, and signal sampling.
- To provide insights for practitioners in designing novel pulse sequences and optimizing body MR imaging.
Main Methods:
- Classification of artifacts into three main groups: magnetic field imperfections, motion, and signal sampling methods.
- Discussion of specific artifact types including static magnetic field, radiofrequency (RF) field, and gradient field imperfections.
- Review of techniques to address artifacts such as respiratory synchronization, parallel imaging, and adjusting sampling parameters.
Main Results:
- Artifacts are categorized based on their origin: magnetic field (static, RF, gradient), motion, and signal sampling.
- Strategies for ameliorating susceptibility effects include using spin-echo sequences and increasing receiver bandwidth.
- Motion artifacts can be managed with respiratory synchronization and parallel imaging.
Conclusions:
- Effective body MR imaging requires a thorough understanding of artifact causes and mitigation strategies.
- Addressing artifacts is key to overcoming challenges posed by advanced techniques like parallel imaging and higher field strengths.
- Optimizing MR physics knowledge enables practitioners to enhance image quality in body imaging.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

