Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
[Below 26 gestational week prematurity: What support?]
1Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU de Nantes, 38, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes cedex, France.
Insights
Decisions for extremely preterm infants (below 26 weeks gestation) involve complex ethical and medical considerations. Gestational age alone is insufficient for predicting outcomes; prenatal factors and parental wishes are crucial for guiding care.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Intensive Care
- Perinatal Medicine
- Bioethics
Context:
- Management of extremely preterm infants (below 26 weeks gestation) at borderline viability is ethically and medically challenging.
- Survival rates and outcomes for these infants vary significantly, necessitating careful consideration of available literature and international experiences.
- Current practices highlight limitations in neonatal intensive care for very preterm infants (24-25 weeks gestation), despite potentially unfavorable neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Purpose:
- To explore the complexities surrounding intensive care decisions for extremely preterm infants.
- To emphasize the inadequacy of gestational age as the sole predictor of survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- To advocate for a multidisciplinary approach that incorporates parental preferences and considers various prenatal factors.
Summary:
- Gestational age alone is unreliable for predicting survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.
- Prenatal factors such as corticosteroid administration, gender, estimated fetal weight, and umbilical Doppler flow are important predictors.
- Multidisciplinary discussions involving parents are essential for determining active resuscitation or palliative management, respecting individual wishes.
Impact:
- Highlights the need for individualized counseling and shared decision-making with parents regarding preterm infant care.
- Underscores the importance of specialized maternofetal centers for managing high-risk pregnancies and births.
- Addresses the controversial role of delivery route, including cesarean section, in improving survival rates for extremely preterm infants while acknowledging maternal risks.
Abstract:
Management and decision whether to begin intensive care for very preterm infants below 26 WG and at borderline viability remains controversial, and survival rates for these children vary greatly and justify discussion with regards to literature data and according to the experience of others countries. If active management is more difficult with very preterm infants 24-25 WG, mortality is increased comparing with newborns of more than 26 WG. This is partly explained by limitations of active neonatal intensive care. Nevertheless, neurocomportemental and cognitive results are not so unfavorable. This justifies a human, medical, and ethical multidiciplinary discussion including the parents' wishes for an active resuscitation or a palliative management. Using the only criteria of gestational age is not a reliable tool to predict survival and neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants. It is very important to identify other prenatal factors such prenatal corticosteroid administration, gender, fetal estimated weight, amniotic fluid and absent/reverse end diastolic flow umbilical doppler. Implication and listening the parents' preferences are essential after individual information, objective and a honest counseling including mortality, morbidity and risks of neurocomportmental impairments. Birth and counseling should be done in reference maternofetal center with obstetricians and neonatalogist specialized in this topic. A real difficulty is to consider the route of delivery and the possibility that caesarean section could improve survival rates. Induction of labour is very often a high risk of failure and route of delivery remains controversial and this is a real question in order to improve survival rates. Literature is poor and conflicting without randomized trials. Caesarean section presents maternal risks such as pathologic placentation, haemorrhage delivery and increasing risks for the subsequent gestation. So, if it is not a good idea to recommend a systematic caesarean delivery, it is not ethical to refuse this route of delivery only because of the gestational age even in extremely premature birth.
Related Concept Videos
Fetal Circulation
Two umbilical arteries transport blood from the fetus to the placenta. At the placenta, the blood absorbs oxygen and nutrients while simultaneously eliminating waste products. This oxygen-enriched and nutrient-rich blood then returns to the fetus through one...
Teratogenicity

