Related Experiment Videos
Comparing Subscription-Based Anatomy E-Resources for Collections Development
Caitlin McClurg1, Vivian Stieda, Nicole Talsma
1a Health Sciences Library , University of Calgary , Calgary , Alberta , Canada.
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
|July 28, 2015
Summary
Health sciences libraries can compare anatomy e-resources using a developed chart. Specialized resources for cadaver videos, self-assessment, and 3D anatomy models offer superior user experiences.
Area of Science:
- Anatomy Education
- Health Sciences Librarianship
- Digital Resource Evaluation
Background:
- Health sciences libraries curate digital resources for anatomy education.
- Evaluating the quality and usability of anatomy e-resources is crucial.
- A systematic approach is needed to compare diverse anatomy e-resource offerings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply a chart-based method for evaluating anatomy e-resources.
- To compare features, functionalities, and user experiences of leading anatomy e-resources.
- To identify preferred e-resources based on specific anatomical learning needs.
Main Methods:
- An iterative chart development process by investigators.
- Assessment of seven leading subscription-based anatomy e-resources.
- Evaluation criteria included features, functionalities, and user experience.
Main Results:
- Acland's Video Atlas of Human Anatomy, Thieme Winking Skull, and Visible Body were preferred.
- Each excelled in specific areas: cadaver videos, self-assessment, and 3D manipulation.
- Specialized anatomy teaching resources outperformed comprehensive ones.
Conclusions:
- A chart-based approach provides a structured method for e-resource comparison.
- Specialized anatomy e-resources offer superior value for targeted learning objectives.
- User experience is a key factor in selecting effective anatomy e-resources.