Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

4.3K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.3K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.7K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.7K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.4K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.4K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

399
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
399
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.8K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.8K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

1.2K
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fatigue Is a Key Contributor to Quality of Life in Heart Valve Disease and After Valve Replacement/Repair: A Qualitative Study.

Heart, lung & circulation·2026
Same author

The 'Public' in Public Involvement: A Call to Centre Frontline Staff Voices in Health Workforce Research.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same author

The semantic differential questionnaire format warrants consideration for use in healthcare settings.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Assessing clinical and cost effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 10-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

The Lancet. Rheumatology·2025
Same author

Challenges and Solutions to Supporting Physical Literacy within Youth Sport.

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025
Same author

New Ways of Working to Manage and Improve Quality in Integrated Care Systems in England.

International journal of health policy and management·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

The Outcomes and Experiences Questionnaire: development and validation.

Elizabeth Gibbons1, Paul Hewitson1, David Morley1

  • 1Health Service Research Unit, Nuffield, Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Patient Related Outcome Measures
|July 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The new Outcomes and Experiences Questionnaire (OEQ) effectively measures patient outcomes and care experiences in a single, short instrument. Validation studies confirm its reliability for assessing patient-reported data after surgery and during hospital stays.

Keywords:
NHSpatient experiencepatient reported outcome measuresquestionnaire

More Related Videos

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

4.3K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

4.3K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

19.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Health Psychology

Background:

  • Developing comprehensive patient assessment tools is crucial for improving healthcare quality.
  • Existing instruments often address outcomes or experiences separately.
  • A unified measure for both domains can streamline data collection and analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate the Outcomes and Experiences Questionnaire (OEQ).
  • To create a concise instrument capturing both patient-reported outcomes and care experiences.
  • To assess the OEQ's psychometric properties and utility in diverse clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • The OEQ was developed through literature reviews, iterative drafting, and cognitive testing.
  • Two validation studies were conducted with 490 surgical patients and 586 inpatient survey participants.
  • Study designs involved analyzing OEQ data against established Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and National Health Service (NHS) inpatient survey data.

Main Results:

  • Study one demonstrated substantial construct validity for the OEQ, especially for hip/knee replacement patients.
  • OEQ sub-scales showed predicted relationships with other PROMs variables.
  • Study two broadly confirmed hypotheses regarding the OEQ's two sub-scales in relation to existing patient experience domains.

Conclusions:

  • The Outcomes and Experiences Questionnaire (OEQ) shows promise as a tool for assessing distinct patient reports on care outcomes and experiences.
  • The OEQ offers a valuable, consolidated approach to capturing patient perspectives in a single, short questionnaire.
  • Further evidence supports the OEQ's capacity to provide meaningful insights into the patient journey.