Ulnar Head Replacement: 21 Cases; Mean Follow-Up, 7.5 Years
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Peter Axelsson1, Christer Sollerman1, Johan Kärrholm2
1Department of Hand Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Purpose:
To report clinical and radiographic outcomes for the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis after a mean of 7.5 years (range, 2.0-12.5 years).
Methods:
We performed 22 Herbert ulnar head prosthesis arthroplasties between 2000 and 2011. Five were primary procedures, and the remaining 17 were done after an average of 2 (range, 1-5) previous operations. The mean age at surgery was 55 years (range, 31-74 years). Follow-up including clinical examination, standardized questionnaires, and radiographic examination was done after mean 7.5 years (range, 2.0-12.5 years) in 21 cases. We used the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire, and the Mayo wrist score questionnaire. Pain and satisfaction were evaluated with a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Measurements of range of motion and strength for grip were recorded.
Results:
Wrist range of motion was not affected by the arthroplasty except for supination, which significantly improved from 55° to 70°. At follow-up, grip strength averaged 25 kg (range, 10-48 kg) in the operated wrists and 31 kg (range, 8-74 kg) on the contralateral side. Visual analog scale-pain averaged 2.9 (range, 0-8.7) during activity and 1.7 (range, 0-7) at rest. Satisfaction VAS was 8.9 (range, 4.3-10). Five patients had VAS-pain above 5 during activity, and 1 patient was dissatisfied and regretted having undergone arthroplasty. Mean outcomes were 27 (range, 5-50) for Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand measure, 31 (range, 0-90) for the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score, and 71 (range, 30-90) for the Mayo wrist score. One patient was reoperated with capsuloplasty 9 months after the arthroplasty owing to recurrence of painful instability. Full stability was not achieved but the pain resolved. None of the implants showed any radiographic signs of loosening.
Conclusions:
The Herbert ulnar head prosthesis was a safe method of treatment and provided satisfactory midterm results for selected cases of distal radioulnar joint disorders.
Clinical Relevance:
Increased knowledge of performance for ulnar head implant arthroplasty may aid surgical decision making for distal radioulnar joint disorders.
Type Of Study/Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic IV.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
09:07Author Spotlight: Advancing Endoscopic Ossiculoplasty – Techniques, Innovations, and Practical Guidance for Clinical Integration
Published on: January 26, 2024