Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

840
Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...
840

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
Same author

Clinical Predictors of Fatal Outcomes from Human Leptospirosis, Thailand, 2015-2024.

Emerging infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Distribution and epidemiology of brucellosis in China.

Veterinary research communications·2026
Same author

Aardvark: sifting through differences in a mound of variants.

Genome biology·2026
Same author

Clinical and molecular characterization of an outbreak of leptospirosis in dogs from Los Angeles County, California, USA, 2021.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2026
Same author

Cellulosimicrobium Sepsis: Identification of an Emerging Pathogen Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K

Best practices for evaluating single nucleotide variant calling methods for microbial genomics.

Nathan D Olson1, Steven P Lund2, Rebecca E Colman3

  • 1Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, Material Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Frontiers in Genetics
|July 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review focuses on validating variant calling in bacterial genomics. It highlights the need for standardized methods to ensure accurate analysis of nucleotide-level differences for advancing research.

Keywords:
indelnext-generation sequencingperformance metricssingle nucleotide variantsvariant calling

More Related Videos

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.3K
Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.7K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.3K
Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency
18:10

Isolation of Fidelity Variants of RNA Viruses and Characterization of Virus Mutation Frequency

Published on: June 16, 2011

30.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Microbial genomics

Background:

  • Sequencing technologies have advanced biological understanding, generating vast datasets.
  • Analysis of this data requires meticulous attention for reliable results.
  • Current focus in bacterial genomics is on genome assembly, neglecting variant caller evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on validating algorithms and pipelines for bacterial variant calling.
  • To address the critical need for evaluating variant callers in bacterial genomics.
  • To establish groundwork for standardized performance evaluation and reporting.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of variant calling procedures and potential error sources.
  • Identification of suitable datasets for algorithm evaluation.
  • Description of statistical methods for assessing algorithm performance.

Main Results:

  • Variant calling is crucial for comparative genomics and understanding organismal differences.
  • Potential error sources exist throughout the multistep variant calling process.
  • Accurate variant calling is essential for the progress of bacterial genomics.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized methods for variant caller evaluation are necessary as the field moves to applied settings.
  • This review aims to lay the foundation for developing these essential standards.
  • Robust validation of variant calling is critical for reliable bacterial genomic research.