Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.4K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

2.0K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
2.0K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

2.5K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
2.5K
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

7.8K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personalized air quality monitoring and respiratory health in moderate and severe asthma: Findings from a six-month observational study.

Environment international·2026
Same author

Intrinsic noise reveals the stability of a neuronal network.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Signal Preprocessing in Instrument-Based Electronic Noses Leads to Parsimonious Predictive Models: Application to Olive Oil Quality Control.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Gain modulation and odor concentration invariance in early olfactory networks.

PLoS computational biology·2023
Same author

Canine-inspired Unidirectional Flows for Improving Memory Effects in Machine Olfaction.

Integrative and comparative biology·2023
Same author

COVID-19 impact on maritime traffic and corresponding pollutant emissions. The case of the Port of Barcelona.

Journal of environmental management·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.5K

Data set from chemical sensor array exposed to turbulent gas mixtures.

Jordi Fonollosa1, Irene Rodríguez-Luján1, Marco Trincavelli1

  • 1University of California, San Diego, USA.

Data in Brief
|July 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study tested chemo-resistive gas sensors in realistic turbulent gas mixtures using a wind tunnel. The novel setup captures spatio-temporal data for improved chemical detection in dynamic environments.

Keywords:
Chemical SensingChemometricsElectronic noseMachine learningMachine olfaction

More Related Videos

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

6.7K
Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector
06:05

Additive Manufacturing-Enabled Low-Cost Particle Detector

Published on: March 24, 2023

2.5K
Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
10:42

Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing

Published on: March 22, 2019

6.7K
Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer
05:00

Measuring Dissolved Methane in Aquatic Ecosystems Using An Optical Spectroscopy Gas Analyzer

Published on: July 26, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Chemical sensing
  • Sensor technology
  • Environmental monitoring

Background:

  • Traditional chemical detection systems use controlled environments, limiting real-world applicability.
  • Chemo-resistive sensors are common but often tested under ideal, non-turbulent conditions.
  • Realistic environments exhibit turbulent gas mixtures with concentration fluctuations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of a chemo-resistive gas sensor array in turbulent gas mixtures.
  • To develop a testing platform that mimics natural gas plume dynamics.
  • To provide a dataset for advancing chemical discrimination algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a wind tunnel with two independent gas sources to create naturally mixing turbulent plumes.
  • Exposed an 8-sensor array to binary mixtures of ethylene with methane or carbon monoxide.
  • Varied volatile release rates and repeated measurements for robust data collection (180 total).

Main Results:

  • Sensor arrays captured spatio-temporal information from turbulent gas plumes.
  • The experimental setup successfully reproduced natural gas concentration fluctuations.
  • Generated a comprehensive dataset for analyzing sensor responses in complex environments.

Conclusions:

  • Wind tunnel testing provides a more realistic environment for chemo-resistive gas sensors.
  • The developed platform enables better understanding of sensor performance in dynamic conditions.
  • The dataset supports research in chemical discrimination and sensor array development.