Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

101.7K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
101.7K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

19.3K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
19.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Population-scale Y chromosome assemblies reveal recurrent remodeling within constrained architectures.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The complete genome of the KOLF2.1J reference iPSC line.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A complete diploid human genome benchmark for personalized genomics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

A chromosome-level genome assembly of the Hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus), a model for human pathogenic virus infections.

BMC biology·2025
Same author

The genome of the colonial hydroid <i>Hydractinia</i> reveals that their stem cells use a toolkit of evolutionarily shared genes with all animals.

Genome research·2024
Same author

Random forest classifiers trained on simulated data enable accurate short read-based genotyping of structural variants in the alpha globin region at Chr16p13.3.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same journal

Model-based quantification of protein-protein interaction aberrations for exploring dysregulated signalling pathways through pathway maps and gene expression levels.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Research on multi-trait genome association study method based on Shannon information entropy.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A multi-view feature fusion framework with interpretable graph convolution for predicting microbe-drug associations.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Covariance decomposition for distance based species tree estimation.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SNPio: a Python interface for population genomic data processing.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SpaHNR: a spatial domain identification method via sparse attention-based hierarchical node representation and multi-view contrastive learning.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.8K

Evaluation of variant detection software for pooled next-generation sequence data.

Howard W Huang1, , James C Mullikin2

  • 1National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. hhuang58@jhu.edu.

BMC Bioinformatics
|July 30, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Five variant detection programs were evaluated for pooled sequencing data. GATK, CRISP, and LoFreq showed high accuracy, with CRISP and LoFreq being more computationally efficient than GATK.

More Related Videos

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

35.0K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.8K
Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
09:34

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

35.0K
Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

38.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Pooled sequencing is a cost-saving method for variant detection.
  • Limited information exists on the accuracy and usability of pooled sequencing analysis tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of five variant detection programs for pooled sequencing data.
  • To compare their accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, runtime, and memory usage.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated pooled sequencing data (BAM files) from single-sample data.
  • Inclusion of varying numbers of samples and depths of coverage.
  • Evaluation of The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK), CRISP, LoFreq, VarScan, and SNVer.

Main Results:

  • GATK, CRISP, and LoFreq achieved balanced accuracy >= 80%.
  • CRISP and LoFreq demonstrated superior computational efficiency (time and memory) compared to GATK.
  • VarScan and SNVer had lower sensitivity despite lower false positive rates.

Conclusions:

  • GATK, CRISP, and LoFreq are recommended for accurate pooled sequencing variant detection.
  • CRISP and LoFreq offer a more resource-efficient alternative to GATK.
  • Program choice depends on the balance between accuracy, sensitivity, and computational resources.