Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

548
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
548
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.0K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.0K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.4K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.4K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

335
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
335
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

407
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
407

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) in regulatory submissions and research: a landscape analysis.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same author

Transportability to the European Population of Efficacy of Belumosudil as Compared With Physician's Choice of Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease.

Transplantation and cellular therapy·2026
Same author

Assessing Treatment Effects in Observational Data With Missing Confounders: A Comparative Study of Practical Doubly-Robust and Traditional Missing Data Methods.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Adaptive Sparsening and Smoothing of the Treatment Model for Longitudinal Causal Inference Using Outcome-Adaptive LASSO and Marginal Fused LASSO.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Do machine learning methods make better predictions than conventional ones in pharmacoepidemiology? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2025
Same author

The role of lipids in the effect of APOE2 on cognitive function: a causal mediation analysis.

European journal of epidemiology·2025
Same journal

Predicting birth weight by multivariate functional principal component regressions.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Robust median regression for count data with general lower truncation using a contaminated discrete Weibull model.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Handling the uncertainty issue of missingness via a mixture-structure-based method.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Statistical method for pooling categorical biomarker data from multi-center matched/nested case-control studies.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
Same journal

Prognostic score methods for the estimation of the average causal effect.

The international journal of biostatistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K

Variable Selection for Confounder Control, Flexible Modeling and Collaborative Targeted Minimum Loss-Based Estimation

Mireille E Schnitzer, Judith J Lok, Susan Gruber

    The International Journal of Biostatistics
    |July 31, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Flexible propensity score modeling in causal inference can lead to poor estimation, especially with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Targeted minimum loss-based estimation and C-TMLE offer more robust alternatives for estimating causal effects.

    More Related Videos

    A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
    13:54

    A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

    Published on: August 18, 2023

    6.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

    A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
    12:18

    A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Published on: January 11, 2020

    8.2K
    A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM
    13:54

    A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle LNP Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models SVEM

    Published on: August 18, 2023

    6.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Causal Inference
    • Statistical Modeling
    • Machine Learning in Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Propensity score modeling is crucial for estimating causal effects in observational studies.
    • Automated variable selection for propensity scores can introduce bias, particularly when including variables that are causes of the exposure.
    • Flexible modeling approaches (nonparametric, machine learning) offer potential but require careful implementation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the appropriateness of flexible propensity score modeling within semiparametric causal inference frameworks.
    • To evaluate the impact of variable selection strategies on the estimation of causal quantities.
    • To compare different automated variable selection methods in various dimensional settings.

    Main Methods:

    • Overview of knowledge-based vs. statistical variable selection in causal inference.
    • Demonstration of consequences of adjusting for pure causes of exposure using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).
    • Description of Collaborative Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation (C-TMLE) for covariate selection.
    • Simulation study comparing automated variable selection approaches in low- and high-dimensional data.

    Main Results:

    • IPTW with flexible propensity score prediction can yield inferior causal effect estimates.
    • Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation (TMLE) and C-TMLE demonstrate robustness to highly treatment-correlated variables when using flexible prediction.
    • Standard influence function-based variance estimation methods showed underestimation of standard errors, leading to poor coverage in specific scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • Flexible propensity score modeling requires careful consideration to avoid biased causal effect estimation.
    • TMLE and C-TMLE show promise for robust causal inference, especially in high-dimensional settings with complex treatment-effect relationships.
    • Further research is needed to refine variance estimation methods for flexible prediction models in causal inference.