Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Does thrombolytic therapy harm or help in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) caused by the spontaneous
Insights
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) can cause myocardial infarction in young women. Thrombolytic therapy may be a viable treatment option, leading to good clinical outcomes in some cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of myocardial infarction, predominantly affecting young women without traditional cardiovascular risk factors or during the peripartum period.
- SCAD management is challenging due to a lack of established guidelines and often carries a poor prognosis.
Observation:
- A case of acute myocardial infarction in a young woman was attributed to spontaneous dissection of the left anterior descending coronary artery.
- Initial treatment involved thrombolytic therapy followed by conservative management, with coronary angiography revealing a normal artery two years later.
Findings:
- Analysis of 19 published cases treated with thrombolysis for SCAD indicated a low complication rate, with only one reported adverse event.
- The presented case and eight others suggest that thrombolysis can lead to favorable clinical outcomes in SCAD patients.
Implications:
- Clinicians should consider SCAD in young women presenting with myocardial infarction, particularly those with no cardiovascular risk factors or in the peripartum phase.
- While thrombolytic therapy shows promise, further data is needed to confirm its safety and efficacy as a standard treatment for SCAD.
Introduction:
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a very rare disease with poor prognosis. It mainly affects young women free of risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) and women during the peripartum period. The prognosis for myocardial infarction caused by SCAD is poor, management is often difficult and guidelines still missing.
Case Report:
We presented a woman with acute myocardial infarction of anterior wall of the left ventricle, caused by spontaneous dissection of medial segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery. We treated the patient with thrombolytic therapy and performed coronary angiography after that. Finally we decided to do nothing more. Two years later we performed coronary angiography again and founded the coronary artery normal. We also analyzed 19 cases publiched from 1996 to 2012 when coronary artery dissection had been treated with thrombolytic agent Analysis revealed only one case of 19, with complication after treating SCAD with thrombolysis.
Conclusion:
Sometimes, regarding myocardial infarction in young women with no risk factors for CAD, especially in young women in peripartum, we should think about SCAD. The presented case, like eight others, demonstrates that good clinical outcomes can be achieved with thrombolysis. In spite of all this, we still need more data to verify that thrombolysis does not have to harm the therapy for SCAD. For the time being thrombolytic therapy could be an option.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

