Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing
Jinqiu Sang1, Hongmei Hu2, Chengshi Zheng3
1Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK; Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
A new sparse coding shrinkage (SCS) algorithm shows promise for hearing aid noise reduction. While effective, it introduces distortions perceived by normal-hearing listeners but not by those with hearing impairments.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Signal Processing
- Speech Technology
Background:
- Limited research comprehensively evaluates noise reduction algorithms' impact on speech quality for hearing-impaired (HI) individuals.
- Existing studies often focus on speech intelligibility, neglecting subjective quality assessments.
- A model-based sparse coding shrinkage (SCS) algorithm has demonstrated competitive speech intelligibility compared to traditional Wiener filters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively evaluate the effects of noise reduction algorithms on speech quality for HI listeners.
- To quantitatively link speech intelligibility benefits with speech quality using the Interpolated Paired Comparison Rating (IPCR) method.
- To compare the performance of the SCS algorithm against a Wiener filter in terms of subjective speech quality and objective measures.
Main Methods:
- Subjective speech quality tests were conducted using the Interpolated Paired Comparison Rating (IPCR) method.
- Objective measures including frequency-weighted segmental signal-to-noise ratio (fwsegSNR), perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), and hearing aid speech quality index (HASQI) were employed.
- Comparisons were made between the SCS algorithm, a Wiener filter, and listener groups including hearing-impaired (HI) and normal-hearing (NH) individuals.
Main Results:
- Little difference in speech quality was observed between the SCS and Wiener filter algorithms for HI listeners.
- HI listeners generally provided better quality ratings for noise reduction algorithms than NH listeners.
- The SCS algorithm reduced noise more efficiently but introduced higher distortions, which were detected by NH listeners but not by HI listeners.
Conclusions:
- The SCS algorithm is a promising candidate for noise reduction in hearing aids, offering efficient noise reduction.
- Care must be taken when adapting algorithms developed for NH listeners to hearing aid applications for HI individuals.
- Algorithms evaluated negatively by NH listeners may still offer significant benefits to HI users.
Related Concept Videos
Downsampling
The Fourier transform of the decimated sequence reveals a combination of scaled and shifted versions of the original spectrum. This...
Reducing Line Loss
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss in...
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
Shrinkage in Concrete
When concrete is still in its plastic state, it can undergo a decrease in volume by about 1% of its absolute volume. This decrease is known as plastic shrinkage. It arises either...
Unsoundness of Aggregate due to Volume Change
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear....

