Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves
Published on: October 17, 2013
No-React® Injectable BioPulmonic™ valves re-evaluated: discouraging follow-up results
Jochen Grohmann1, René Höhn2, Thilo Fleck2
1Department of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, Heart Centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany jochen.grohmann@universitaets-herzzentrum.de.
Objectives:
The No-React® Injectable BioPulmonic™ valve (BioIntegral) was introduced for minimally invasive off-pump replacement of the pulmonary valve almost 10 years ago. We present our mid- to long-term follow-up results.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of all 7 patients treated at our institution at the median age of 9 (range 1-24) years. The children underwent cardiac catheterization when worsening strain on the right heart was suspected after examining their medical history and/or observing significant changes on echocardiography.
Results:
After a median follow-up period lasting 5.2 (range 0.7-6.7) years, all patients presented the indication for recatheterization, particularly because the maximum instantaneous velocity measured by Doppler had revealed systolic gradients of a median 63 (dP 18-74) mmHg across the right ventricular outflow. Catheterization confirmed severe stenosis in 2, and moderate stenosis together with moderate insufficiency in 4 patients. We observed two principal failure mechanisms: technical problems resulting from poor alignment to the right ventricular outflow tract and structural problems leading to neointimal proliferation even in cases with appropriate prosthesis positioning. At median of 5.7 (0.7-7) years after implantation, 6 of the 7 patients underwent valve rereplacement. Redo surgery was necessary in 3, and percutaneous valve-in-valve implantation in the remaining 3 patients. Histological analysis of two explanted valves confirmed significant neointima proliferation and thickened valve cusps leading to stenosis of the graft.
Conclusions:
These mid-term results after implantation of the No-React® Injectable BioPulmonic™ valve are disappointing. Graft failure was mainly due to neointimal formation and valve malposition.
More Related Videos
05:31Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement from Autologous Pericardium with a Self-Expandable Nitinol Stent in an Adult Sheep Model
Published on: June 8, 2022
06:56Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiac Procedure Testing Prior to Embarking on Large Animal Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Parenteral Drug Delivery Systems: Injectables, Implants, and Infusion Devices