Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.1K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.1K
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations01:08

IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations

2.3K
Identical bonds within a polyatomic group can stretch symmetrically (in-phase) or asymmetrically (out-of-phase). Similar to hydrogen bonding, these vibrations also influence the shape of the IR peak. Generally, asymmetric stretching frequencies are higher than symmetric stretching frequencies. For example, primary amines exhibit two distinct IR peaks between 3300–3500 cm−1 corresponding to the symmetric and asymmetric N-H stretching, while secondary amines exhibit a single...
2.3K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.5K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.5K
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

6.0K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
6.0K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.5K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low-frequency interaural time differences are resistant to across-frequency binaural interference across a range of overall levels.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Lateralization with varying envelope shape and spectral mismatch.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Context effects for degraded speech: Effects of age, preceding or subsequent contextual cues, and signal-to-noise ratio.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

The Roles of Selective Attention and Asymmetric Experience in Bilateral Speech Interference for Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant and Vocoder Listeners.

Ear and hearing·2025
Same author

On the Difficulty of Defining Duration of Deafness for Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Ear and hearing·2025
Same author

Cochlear-implant dichotic listening performance and effort are disrupted with functional ear asymmetry.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.8K

Untrained listeners experience difficulty detecting interaural correlation changes in narrowband noises.

Matthew J Goupell1, Mary E Barrett1

  • 1Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA goupell@umd.edu, mbarrett@umd.edu.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory perception of interaural correlation changes was tested in normal-hearing listeners. Difficulty increased significantly with level roving, especially at higher frequencies, suggesting individual differences impact binaural cue learning.

More Related Videos

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

107

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
06:04

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

1.8K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

107

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Human Hearing

Background:

  • Interaural correlation detection is crucial for sound localization.
  • Understanding how listeners process binaural cues is essential for audiology and hearing aid development.
  • Individual differences in auditory processing can significantly impact performance on psychoacoustic tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate interaural correlation change detection in untrained normal-hearing listeners.
  • To examine the effects of center frequency and level roving on detection thresholds.
  • To explore the role of individual differences in learning and generalizing binaural cues.

Main Methods:

  • Narrowband noises (10-Hz bandwidth) were used.
  • Center frequencies (CF) of 500 Hz and 4000 Hz were tested.
  • Diotic level roving was either absent or present during testing.

Main Results:

  • At 500 Hz CF, 96% of listeners achieved threshold without level roving, compared to only 36% with roving.
  • No listeners achieved threshold at 4000 Hz CF, even without roving.
  • Performance was significantly poorer when level roving was introduced, particularly at 4000 Hz.

Conclusions:

  • Level roving presents a significant challenge for interaural correlation change detection in untrained listeners.
  • High-frequency processing of binaural cues appears more susceptible to level variations.
  • Results highlight the influence of individual differences on the ability to learn and utilize binaural information.