Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity01:12

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity

1.4K
Consider a coffee mug hanging on a hook in a pantry. If the mug gets knocked, it oscillates back and forth like a pendulum until the oscillations die out.
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...
1.4K
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

1.0K
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
1.0K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

1.0K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
1.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Force-Sensitive Mat for Vertical Jump Measurement to Assess Lower Limb Strength: Validity and Reliability Study.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2021
Same author

Sensing Systems for Respiration Monitoring: A Technical Systematic Review.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

Improving Physical Activity Levels and Psychological Variables on University Students in the Contemplation Stage.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2019
Same author

Wearable Sensors for Measuring Movement in Short Sessions of Mindfulness Sitting Meditation: A Pilot Study.

Journal of healthcare engineering·2018
Same author

Expand your body when you look at yourself: The role of the posture in a mirror exposure task.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Combining novelty detectors to improve accelerometer-based fall detection.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.3K

A comparison of public datasets for acceleration-based fall detection.

Raul Igual1, Carlos Medrano1, Inmaculada Plaza1

  • 1R&D&I EduQTech Group, Escuela Universitaria Politecnica de Teruel, University of Zaragoza, Ciudad Escolar s/n, 44003 Teruel, Spain.

Medical Engineering & Physics
|August 3, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Fall detection systems show varied performance due to dataset differences. Algorithms trained on one dataset perform poorly on others, highlighting the need for standardized fall detection data.

Keywords:
AccelerometersComparisonData analysisFall detectionPublic datasets

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.9K
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification
08:05

Design and Analysis for Fall Detection System Simplification

Published on: April 6, 2020

11.3K
Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights
05:26

Author Spotlight: Innovations in iTUG Test for Enhanced Risk Assessment and Cognitive Insights

Published on: October 25, 2024

1.9K
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Gerontology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Falls are a major cause of mortality in older adults, making rapid fall detection crucial.
  • Acceleration-based fall detection using accelerometers or smartphones is an active research area.
  • Existing studies report diverse fall detection rates, complicating comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare publicly available fall detection datasets for the first time.
  • To assess the influence of different datasets on fall detection algorithm performance.
  • To evaluate the generalization capability of fall detection algorithms across datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two distinct fall detection algorithms.
  • Compared algorithm performance across multiple public fall detection datasets.
  • Analyzed the impact of dataset characteristics (e.g., training samples, sampling frequency) on detection accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Fall detection algorithm performance is significantly affected by the specific dataset used for validation.
  • Generalization capability is poor; algorithms perform dramatically worse when tested on unseen datasets.
  • The number of training samples influences performance, while sampling frequency and acceleration range have less impact.

Conclusions:

  • Dataset choice critically impacts the reported performance of fall detection algorithms.
  • Current fall detection models exhibit limited generalization across different datasets.
  • Standardization or careful dataset selection is essential for reliable fall detection system development.