Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

676
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
676
Classification of Systems-II01:31

Classification of Systems-II

568
Continuous-time systems have continuous input and output signals, with time measured continuously. These systems are generally defined by differential or algebraic equations. For instance, in an RC circuit, the relationship between input and output voltage is expressed through a differential equation derived from Ohm's law and the capacitor relation,
568
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.6K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.6K
Aggregates Classification01:29

Aggregates Classification

1.2K
Aggregate classification is generally based on its size, petrographic characteristics, weight, and source. Size classification ranges from coarse to fine aggregates, defined by the size of the particles. Coarse aggregates are particles that do not pass through ASTM sieve No. 4, and aggregates that pass through the sieve are fine aggregates.
Petrographic classification groups aggregates based on common mineralogical characteristics. Some of the common mineral groups found in aggregates are...
1.2K
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.6K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.6K
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

16.7K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
16.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

JADE: Joint Alignment and Deep Embedding for Multi-Slice Spatial Transcriptomics.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026
Same author

Results of a phase 1 trial testing ruxolitinib plus venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Blood neoplasia·2026
Same author

Phenotypic prediction of missense variants via deep contrastive learning.

Nature biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

DEDUCE: statistical inference on disease-associated genes uncovers tissue-disease associations.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Designing strongly coupled polaritonic structures via statistical machine learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

JADE: Joint Alignment and Deep Embedding for Multi-Slice Spatial Transcriptomics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Instrumental Variable Estimation of Marginal Structural Mean Models for Time-Varying Treatment.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Semiparametric Joint Modeling for Survival Analysis with Longitudinal Covariates.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Dimension Reduction for Large-Scale Federated Data: Statistical Rate and Asymptotic Inference.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Facilitating Heterogeneous Effect Estimation via Statistically Efficient Categorical Modifiers.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Nonparametric Density Estimation of a Long-Term Trend from Repeated Semicontinuous Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same journal

Functional Integrative Bayesian Analysis of High-dimensional Multiplatform Clinicogenomic Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K

Risk Classification with an Adaptive Naive Bayes Kernel Machine Model.

Jessica Minnier1, Ming Yuan2, Jun S Liu3

  • 1Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
|August 4, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel two-stage method using gene-set structures to improve genetic risk prediction for complex traits. The approach enhances the identification and estimation of genetic markers, outperforming existing methods.

Keywords:
Gene-set analysisGenetic associationGenetic pathwaysKernel PCAKernel machine regressionPrincipal component analysisRisk prediction

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Genetic studies of complex traits identify few risk markers, explaining limited heritability and offering poor disease risk prediction.
  • Standard single-marker methods lack power and often fail to account for non-linear effects, complicating the identification of weak genetic signals.
  • Grouping markers by biological knowledge, such as gene structure, may improve the power and efficiency of estimating genetic effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel two-stage statistical method for genetic risk modeling that leverages gene-set structures.
  • To improve the identification and estimation of genetic risk markers for complex traits.
  • To enhance disease risk prediction by accounting for non-linear effects and joint marker influences.

Main Methods:

  • A two-stage approach utilizing known gene-set structures to relate genetic markers to disease risk.
  • Employing a naive Bayes kernel machine (KM) model to estimate gene-set specific risk models, capable of handling non-linear effects.
  • A regularization procedure in the second stage aggregates information across gene-sets, with kernel principal component analysis enhancing efficiency.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively relates gene-sets to disease risk by modeling potentially non-linear marker effects.
  • The two-stage approach with regularization and kernel PCA improves estimation and computational efficiency.
  • Numerical studies indicate the proposed procedure outperforms existing methods for constructing genetic risk models.

Conclusions:

  • The novel two-stage method effectively utilizes gene-set structures to enhance genetic risk prediction for complex traits.
  • The approach improves the power and efficiency of identifying and estimating the effects of genetic markers.
  • This method offers a promising advancement over current procedures for building robust genetic risk models.