Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

52.6K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
52.6K
Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

46.7K
Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
46.7K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

8.9K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Redefining the real problem in psychedelic trials: Why fighting the Lessebo matters more than blinding integrity.

The International journal on drug policy·2026
Same author

Exposure to Global Burden of Disease dietary factors and risk of recurrent depressive symptoms: the prospective Whitehall II cohort study.

European journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Ferritin light-chain contributes to hair cells function and survival.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Validation of a VO<sub>2</sub>max Z-score model for fitness assessment in a healthy Spanish pediatric population.

Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.)·2026
Same author

Electrophysiological study of the ototoxicity of kanamycin during development in guinea pigs.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Automated thrombin generation assay in patients entering hospital for total hip or knee arthroplasty: A prospective study.

Thrombosis research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

15.0K

Modeling of Auditory Neuron Response Thresholds with Cochlear Implants.

Frederic Venail1, Thibault Mura2, Mohamed Akkari3

  • 1ENT Department and University Montpellier 1, University Hospital Gui de Chauliac, 34295 Montpellier, France ; Audiology Department I-PAudioM, INSERM U1051 Unit, Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, 34081 Montpellier, France.

Biomed Research International
|August 4, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Cochlear implant efficiency relies on the prosthetic-neural interface. Neural response telemetry (NRT) thresholds are influenced by electrode impedance, placement, and insertion depth, offering insights into auditory neuron function.

More Related Videos

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
The Miniature Pig: A Large Animal Model for Cochlear Implant Research
06:16

The Miniature Pig: A Large Animal Model for Cochlear Implant Research

Published on: July 28, 2022

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

15.0K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K
The Miniature Pig: A Large Animal Model for Cochlear Implant Research
06:16

The Miniature Pig: A Large Animal Model for Cochlear Implant Research

Published on: July 28, 2022

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience
  • Otolaryngology

Background:

  • Prosthetic-neural interface quality is crucial for cochlear implant (CI) effectiveness.
  • CI efficiency depends on technical factors (electrode position, impedance) and neural factors (auditory neuron count).
  • Electrophysiological measures like electrically evoked compound potentials (e-CAP) assess electrical stimulation efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model auditory neuron activation in cochlear implant recipients using a Nucleus device.
  • To analyze the relationship between technical/anatomical factors and neural responses.
  • To establish a method for assessing auditory neuron function post-implantation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized auto-NRT (neural response telemetry) to measure electrical responses in CI users.
  • Employed multivariate regression with cubic splines for data analysis.
  • Investigated factors including electrode impedance, scalar placement, and insertion depth (via characteristic neuron frequency - CNF).

Main Results:

  • NRT thresholds were significantly correlated with electrode squared impedance (β = -0.11 ± 0.02, P < 0.01).
  • Scalar electrode placement (β = -8.50 ± 1.97, P < 0.01) and insertion depth (CNF) also significantly affected NRT thresholds.
  • The distribution of NRT residuals based on CNF served as a proxy for auditory neuron function.

Conclusions:

  • Electrode impedance, scalar position, and insertion depth are key determinants of neural activation thresholds in cochlear implants.
  • NRT analysis, particularly residual distribution by CNF, can provide valuable insights into the functional state of auditory neurons.
  • This approach aids in optimizing cochlear implant performance and understanding neural adaptation.