Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

4.3K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.3K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.2K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.2K
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

1.4K
Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
1.4K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.7K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.7K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

18.1K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
18.1K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

396
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
396

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors associated with the online postal self-sampling testing cascade in England, 2022: a retrospective observational study of routinely collected service-level healthcare data.

Sexually transmitted infections·2026
Same author

Evaluating the implementation of a mental health joint response with young people and families: protocol for the care responders study, a realist and health economic evaluation.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

A realist synthesis of integrated palliative care and oncology: Synopsis.

Health and social care delivery research·2026
Same author

Addressing the causes of 'missingness' in healthcare: a co-designed suite of interventions.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

What are we missing? Reflections on the 'problem' of missed appointments in the UK.

NIHR open research·2026
Same author

Recovery Colleges for post-diagnostic dementia support: The DiSCOVERY realist evaluation synopsis.

Health and social care delivery research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Protocol--the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation.

Trisha Greenhalgh1, Geoff Wong1, Justin Jagosh2

  • 1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

BMJ Open
|August 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This project develops quality standards and training for realist evaluations (RE), a popular health research method. It aims to improve consistency and capacity for conducting and understanding RE, benefiting researchers and lay participants.

Keywords:
EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)MEDICAL JOURNALISM

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.8K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Evaluation Methodologies
  • Realist Evaluation

Background:

  • Realist evaluation (RE) is a growing methodology in health services research.
  • There is a need for standardized quality and reporting guidelines for RE.
  • Capacity building for conducting and evaluating RE is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop quality and reporting standards for realist evaluations.
  • To create training materials for researchers and lay participants involved in RE.
  • To build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating realist evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • An interdisciplinary Delphi panel was convened to refine best practices.
  • Real-world experiences and challenges of RE were captured.
  • Quality standards, training materials, and resources for lay participants were developed and evaluated.

Main Results:

  • Quality and reporting standards for RE were produced.
  • Training materials for researchers and lay members were developed and delivered.
  • Accessible resources for patients and the public participating in RE were created.

Conclusions:

  • Realist evaluation is a developing approach in health research.
  • Establishing quality assurance and uniform reporting standards is crucial for improving RE quality and consistency.