Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2026

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
Published on: February 27, 2014
Testing for non-randomness of events in sparse data situations
1Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract:
In experiments involving cytogenetic assays or mutation assays it is often of interest to determine if there are hot spots for certain events, that is, to determine if the events occur more often at certain sites than would be expected under the assumption of randomness. In examining chromosome aberrations using banded chromosome preparations, for example, it may be of interest to determine if a particular type of aberration occurs more often in a particular band than would be expected given the relative length of the band. In a mutation assay it may be of interest to determine if a mutation occurs more often at a particular nucleotide in a given sequence than would be expected given the length of the sequence in question. Such experiments typically result in data following a multinomial distribution with a large number of classes and relatively few observations. For such data, De Braekeleer & Smith (1988) have suggested analysis of the frequencies in individual classes using an exact binomial test. Two cautions are noted for application of the binomial analysis in the usual situation in which the locations of potential hot spots are not specified beforehand.
Related Concept Videos
Unusual Results
According to the range rule of thumb, any value above or below two standard deviations, 2σ from the mean, μ is considered unusual.
Maximum unusual value = μ + 2σ
Minimum unusual value...
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I
The test works...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Random and Systematic Errors

