Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

06:48
Assessing Intertidal Populations of the Invasive European Green Crab
Published on: September 16, 2020
6.7K
Increased Primary Production from an Exotic Invader Does Not Subsidize Native Rodents
Jacob E Lucero1, Phil S Allen1, Brock R McMillan1
1Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Plos One
|August 6, 2015
Summary
Invasive cheatgrass seeds significantly increased food availability but were not preferred by native small mammals. This suggests invasive plants may not enrich food webs as expected.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Invasive Species Biology
- Food Web Dynamics
Background:
- Invasive plants can alter ecosystems by increasing primary productivity.
- Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) is an aggressive invader in the Great Basin Desert.
- Native granivorous small mammals are key consumers in desert ecosystems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utilization of cheatgrass seeds by native granivorous small mammals.
- To determine the impact of cheatgrass invasion on seed rain and small mammal populations.
- To assess the role of consumer preference in the trophic integration of invasive resources.
Main Methods:
- Field experiments were conducted in the Great Basin Desert.
- Quantified cheatgrass seed rain density and biomass.
- Assessed small mammal abundance, richness, and diversity in response to seed additions.
- Analyzed small mammal food preferences.
Main Results:
- Cheatgrass invasion increased seed rain density by over 2000% and biomass by over 3500%.
- Small mammal populations showed no positive numerical response to increased cheatgrass seeds.
- Native granivores exhibited a preference for native grass seeds over cheatgrass seeds.
Conclusions:
- Increased primary productivity from invasive plants does not automatically subsidize higher trophic levels.
- Cheatgrass invasion may disrupt native food webs by providing less-preferred resources.
- Native consumer preferences can mediate the impact of invasive species on food webs.
Related Concept Videos
Primary Production
26.0K
The total amount of energy acquired by primary producers in an ecosystem is called gross primary production (GPP). However, of this energy, producers use some for metabolic processes, and some is lost as heat, decreasing the amount of energy available to the next trophic level. The remaining usable amount of energy is called the net primary productivity (NPP). In terrestrial ecosystems, NPP is driven by climate, while light penetration and nutrient availability drive NPP in aquatic ecosystems.
26.0K
Competition
25.4K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
25.4K
Predator-Prey Interactions
22.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.3K
Threats to Biodiversity
27.8K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
27.8K
Microbial Interactions: Predation
41
Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
41
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
30.0K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
30.0K

