Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

10:51
Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
Published on: January 15, 2018
9.0K
How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.
Peter M Vishton1, Evan D Jones, Jennifer A Stevens
1Psychology Department, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, 23187-8795, USA, vishton@wm.edu.
Cognitive Processing
|August 7, 2015
Summary
Visually guided actions reduce size illusion effects. This effect persists even for conscious perception and after the action task ends, demonstrating altered visual processing.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Visual Perception
- Motor Control
Background:
- Visually guided actions may be less susceptible to certain size illusions.
- Previous research indicated reduced illusion magnitudes in action components.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if reduced illusion magnitudes in action components extend to conscious perceptual judgments.
- To characterize how visual size perception is altered by size-mediated behaviors.
Main Methods:
- Participants judged target sizes verbally or by reaching to grasp/touch.
- Visual illusions were induced using contextual elements (e.g., Ebbinghaus illusion).
- Illusion magnitudes were compared across verbal and action-oriented tasks.
Main Results:
- Illusion magnitudes were significantly smaller when participants performed or imagined actions.
- This reduction in illusion magnitude persisted after returning to verbal judgments.
- A motor interference task abolished the illusion reduction effect.
Conclusions:
- Engaging in or imagining actions alters visual size perception, reducing illusion susceptibility.
- Visual processing shifts associated with action persist beyond the motor task.
- Motor interference suggests a link between motor preparation and illusion magnitude reduction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K
Visual Agnosia
1.7K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
1.7K

