Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026
Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation
Published on: July 19, 2021
Outcomes of open partial nephrectomies performed by Australian trainees
Paige E Tucker1,2, Nicholas J Rukin1,3, Gana Kugathasan4
1Department of Urology, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
Background:
Partial nephrectomy (PN) has become the standard of care for small renal tumours, with open partial nephrectomy (OPN) being superseded by minimally invasive PN. Advances in minimal access surgery have resulted in fewer relative contraindications, with subsequently fewer OPN being performed. Consequentially, trainees have less opportunity to gain skills and experience in open renal surgery. The aims of this study were to assess the standard of OPN performed by Australian urological trainees and to define whether OPN is a safe and suitable training opportunity.
Method:
A retrospective review was undertaken on patients who underwent OPN performed by urology trainees from 2010 to 2014 at two training hospitals in Western Australia. Data collected included patient demographics, surgical and oncological outcomes and morbidity.
Results:
Sixty patients underwent OPN, with a mean age of 56 years. Most tumours were single, with mean size 31 mm. Mean operative time was 157 min, with a mean cold ischaemic time of 27 min. Mean pre- and post-operative creatinine levels were equivalent (77 μmol/L). The overall complication rate was 18%, with no documented urinary leaks, and 1.7% blood transfusion rate. Median length of stay was 4 days. There were no oncological positive margins or recurrence after a median follow-up of 2 years.
Conclusion:
Our data support the notion that Australian urological trainees can perform the majority of OPN cases, with equivalent oncological outcomes. We would advocate that when an OPN is being performed, the supervising consultant should use the case as an adjuvant for open renal surgery training.
