Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Identification of alpha1-oleate as a potent regulator of adipokine-dependent metabolism, in bladder cancer tissue.

Cancer & metabolism·2026

Same author

Unmet Treatment Need and Challenges Associated with Comparative Evidence Generation in BCG-unresponsive Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: An Expert Consensus.

European urology oncology·2026

Same author

High Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Fibromyalgia in Functional Motor Disorder.

Movement disorders clinical practice·2026

Same author

Active surveillance in low-grade NMIBC - results of an international two-round modified Delphi consensus.

Nature reviews. Urology·2026

Same author

Developmental trauma in functional motor disorder: the mediating roles of affective symptoms and multimorbidity.

Psychological medicine·2026

Same author

PTCOG Ocular Survey - Perspective on Ocular Particle Therapy: Current Practices and Emerging Trends.

International journal of particle therapy·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

External validation of extended prostate biopsy nomogram.

Jan Hrbáček¹, Ivo Minárik¹, Tomáš Sieger²

¹Department of Urology, 2 Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospital, Charles University Praha, Czech Republic.

Central European Journal of Urology

|August 8, 2015

Summary

This study validated a prostate cancer nomogram, finding it accurate but overestimating risk. Adjusting the nomogram improved its performance for individual patient predictions.

Keywords:

nomogram prostate biopsy prostatic neoplasms

More Related Videos

Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance

Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance

Published on: June 6, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Author Spotlight: Advancing Prostate Cancer Research Through Improved Tissue Sampling and Biobanking

Published on: November 17, 2023

Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance

Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance

Published on: June 6, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

Urology
Oncology
Medical Statistics

Background:

Traditional prostate biopsy nomograms are outdated.
A 10-core biopsy nomogram by Chun et al. (2007) requires external validation.

Purpose of the Study:

To independently validate the Chun et al. (2007) 10-core biopsy nomogram.
To assess the nomogram's predictive accuracy and identify potential biases.

Main Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 322 patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy.
Validation using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots.

Main Results:

The nomogram achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.773, indicating good predictive accuracy.
The nomogram systematically overestimated prostate cancer risk.
A bias correction of -24 points was identified for the studied patient cohort.

Conclusions:

The nomogram demonstrates good overall predictive capability but requires calibration for individual risk assessment.
The study successfully adapted the nomogram to reduce bias in the specific patient sample.
External validation and recalibration are crucial for improving nomogram utility in clinical practice.