Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
Quality indicators for pediatric colonoscopy: results from a multicenter consortium
Kalpesh Thakkar1, Jennifer L Holub2, Mark A Gilger3
1The Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Insights
Pediatric colonoscopy quality is inconsistent, with frequent missing data on bowel prep and anesthesia status. Developing specific quality measures for pediatric endoscopy is crucial for improvement.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Endoscopic Quality Improvement
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- No established quality measures exist for pediatric GI endoscopy.
- Pediatric colonoscopy quality assessment is needed.
- Centralized data registries can facilitate quality evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the baseline quality of pediatric colonoscopy.
- To identify areas for quality improvement in pediatric endoscopy.
- To utilize the Pediatric Endoscopy Database System-Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (PEDS-CORI) for quality assessment.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data collection from 14 pediatric centers (2000-2011).
- Analysis of 21,807 colonoscopy procedures using PEDS-CORI.
- Evaluation of quality indicators: bowel preparation, ileal intubation, ASA class documentation, procedure time.
Main Results:
- Significant inconsistencies in documentation: 56% lacked bowel prep quality, 12.7% lacked ASA class.
- When reported, bowel prep quality was excellent/good/fair in 90.3%.
- Overall ileal intubation rate was 84.0% (excluding procedures not intended for ileum), with variation by indication.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric colonoscopy reports show significant variability and inconsistent documentation.
- The study highlights the need for standardized quality measures in pediatric endoscopy.
- Data from central registries like PEDS-CORI are vital for identifying quality improvement opportunities.
Background And Aims:
Currently, there are no quality measures specific to children undergoing GI endoscopy. We aimed to determine the baseline quality of pediatric colonoscopy by using the Pediatric Endoscopy Database System-Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (PEDS-CORI), a central registry.
Methods:
We conducted prospective data collection by using a standard computerized report generator and central registry (PEDS-CORI) to examine key quality indicators from 14 pediatric centers between January 2000 and December 2011. Specific quality indicators, including bowel preparation, ileal intubation rate, documentation of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System (ASA) class, and procedure time, were compared during the study period.
Results:
We analyzed 21,807 colonoscopy procedures performed in patients with a mean age of 11.5 ± 4.8 years. Of the 21,807 reports received during the study period, 56% did not include bowel preparation quality, and 12.7% did not include ASA classification. When bowel preparation was reported, the quality was described as excellent, good, or fair in 90.3%. The overall ileal intubation rate was 69.4%, and 15.6% reported cecal intubation only, calculated to be 85% cecum or ileum intubation. Thus, 15% of colonoscopy procedures did not report reaching the cecum or ileum. When excluding the proportion of procedures not intended to reach the ileum (31.5%), the overall ileal intubation rate increased to 84.0%. The rate of ileum examination varied from 85% to 95%, depending on procedure indication.
Conclusions:
Colonoscopy reports from our central registry revealed significant variations and inconsistent documentation in pediatric colonoscopy. Our study identifies areas for quality improvement and highlights the need for developing accepted quality measures specific to pediatric endoscopy.
More Related Videos
03:43Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy