Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

QTL Mapping and CRISPR/Cas9 Editing to Identify a Drug Resistance Gene in Toxoplasma gondii
Published on: June 22, 2017
Macrocyclic lactones and their relationship to the SNPs related to benzimidazole resistance
Shoaib Ashraf1, Thangadurai Mani1, Robin Beech1
1Institute of Parasitology, McGill University-Macdonald Campus, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec H9X 3V9, Canada.
Abstract:
Haemonchus contortus is an abomasal nematode of ruminants that is widely present across the world. Its ability to cause death of infected animals and rapidly develop anthelmintic resistance makes it a dangerous pathogen. Ivermectin (IVM) and moxidectin (MOX) are macrocyclic lactones (MLs). They have been successfully used to treat parasitic nematodes over the last three decades. A genetic association between IVM selection and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the β-tubulin isotype 1 gene was reported in H. contortus. These SNPs result in replacing phenylalanine (F, TTC) with tyrosine (Y, TAC) at position 167 or 200 on the β-tubulin protein. Recently we reported a direct interaction of IVM with α- and β-tubulin. It had been hypothesized that the SNPs (F167Y and F200Y) may change tubulin dynamics and directly affect IVM binding. The goal of the current study was to observe the effects of SNPs (F167Y and F200Y) on tubulin polymerization and IVM binding. It was also of interest to evaluate the differences between IVM and MOX on tubulin polymerization. We conclude that the SNPs cause no difference in the polymerization of wild and mutant tubulins. Furthermore, neither of the SNPs reduced IVM binding. Varying results were obtained in the degree of polymerization of parasitic and mammalian tubulin for IVM and MOX, i.e., the extent of polymerization was greater for IVM compared with MOX, for H. contortus tubulin, and vice versa for mammalian tubulin. Molecular modeling showed that IVM and MOX docked into the taxane binding pocket of both mammalian and parasitic wild type and mutant tubulins. However the binding was stronger for mammalian tubulin as compared to parasitic tubulin.
Insights
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Haemonchus contortus do not affect ivermectin (IVM) binding or tubulin polymerization. However, differences in IVM and moxidectin (MOX) binding were observed between parasitic and mammalian tubulin.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Parasitology
- Molecular Biology
- Drug Resistance
Background:
- Haemonchus contortus is a globally significant ruminant parasite, notorious for causing animal deaths and rapid anthelmintic resistance.
- Ivermectin (IVM) and moxidectin (MOX), macrocyclic lactones, are key treatments, but resistance is a growing concern.
- Genetic variations, specifically single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the β-tubulin isotype 1 gene, have been linked to IVM resistance in H. contortus.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of specific H. contortus SNPs (F167Y and F200Y) on β-tubulin polymerization and ivermectin binding.
- To compare the effects of ivermectin and moxidectin on tubulin polymerization.
- To elucidate the molecular interactions of these anthelmintics with both parasitic and mammalian tubulin.
Main Methods:
- In vitro tubulin polymerization assays were performed using wild-type and mutant (F167Y, F200Y) β-tubulin from H. contortus.
- Direct binding assays were conducted to assess ivermectin interaction with mutant and wild-type tubulin.
- Molecular modeling (docking) was employed to visualize the binding of ivermectin and moxidectin to tubulin.
Main Results:
- The studied SNPs (F167Y and F200Y) did not alter tubulin polymerization or reduce ivermectin binding affinity in H. contortus.
- Differential polymerization effects were observed: IVM showed greater polymerization with H. contortus tubulin compared to MOX, while the reverse was true for mammalian tubulin.
- Molecular modeling indicated that both IVM and MOX bind to the taxane pocket of tubulin, with stronger binding observed for mammalian tubulin than parasitic tubulin.
Conclusions:
- The investigated SNPs in H. contortus β-tubulin are unlikely to be the primary mechanism driving ivermectin resistance through altered tubulin dynamics or drug binding.
- Distinct binding interactions between ivermectin and moxidectin with parasitic versus mammalian tubulin may contribute to species-specific efficacy and resistance patterns.
- Further research into the molecular basis of anthelmintic resistance in H. contortus is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Transporters: P-Glycoprotein and Solute Carrier Transporters

