Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

The spring-mass model for running and hopping.

R Blickhan1

  • 1Concord Field Station, Harvard University, Bedford, MA 01730.

Journal of Biomechanics
|January 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leg adjustments as a key: initial insights into quick-release trials between healthy controls and chronic non-specific low back pain patients.

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2016
Same author

Vertical adaptation of the center of mass in human running on uneven ground.

Human movement science·2014
Same author

Determination of three-dimensional muscle architectures: validation of the DTI-based fiber tractography method by manual digitization.

Journal of anatomy·2013
Same author

Extension and customization of self-stability control in compliant legged systems.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2012
Same author

Nature as an engineer: one simple concept of a bio-inspired functional artificial muscle.

Bioinspiration & biomimetics·2012
Same author

Proof of concept of an artificial muscle: theoretical model, numerical model, and hardware experiment.

IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]·2012
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

A spring-mass model reveals that human running and hopping mechanics are constrained by physiological limits. Hoppers optimize frequency for elastic energy storage, with landing velocity significantly influencing movement dynamics.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Locomotion dynamics
  • Human movement analysis

Background:

  • Human locomotion, including running and hopping, involves complex interplay of mechanical parameters.
  • A spring-mass model is a simplified representation used to understand the dynamics of legged locomotion.
  • Understanding these dynamics is crucial for fields ranging from sports science to robotics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interdependency of mechanical parameters in human running and hopping using a spring-mass model.
  • To determine the key parameters that define the system's operational point and constraints.
  • To explore how physiological constraints influence locomotion strategies and energy management.

Main Methods:

  • Development and application of a simple spring-mass model incorporating a massless spring and point mass.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of how parameters like landing velocity and leg length constrain the system's behavior.
  • Examination of the relationship between bouncing frequency, vertical displacement, and elastic energy storage.
  • Comparison of model predictions with empirical data from various animal sizes.
  • Main Results:

    • The spring-mass model demonstrates that locomotion parameters are confined within a specific space due to bouncing mechanics.
    • Bouncing frequency and vertical displacement are closely interrelated, with landing velocity and leg length being critical determinants.
    • Physiological constraints necessitate tuning of parameters for locomotion to be possible.
    • Animals select hopping frequencies that maximize elastic energy delivery and storage.
    • Ground reaction forces and contact times are influenced by landing velocity, not solely by the system's natural frequency.

    Conclusions:

    • The spring-mass model effectively captures the mechanical constraints and parameter interdependencies in human running and hopping.
    • Landing velocity vector significantly shapes kinematic and dynamic patterns, differentiating running from hopping.
    • Despite differences in aerial and contact phases, mass-specific energy fluctuations per distance are predicted to be similar for runners and hoppers across species.
    • The model's predictions align with empirical observations, highlighting its utility in understanding diverse animal locomotion.