Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

142
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
142

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Moving from research tools to risk management tools in endocrine disruptors: Validation.

Annales d'endocrinologie·2025
Same author

Adaptation of the KeratinoSensâ„¢ skin sensitization test to animal-product-free cell culture

ALTEX·2017
Same author

2013 Lush Training Prize winner: XCellR8.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2015
Same author

FRAME's online alternatives timeline goes live.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2014
Same author

FRAME's alternatives timeline project.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2014
Same author

The Third FRAME Toxicity Committee: working toward greater implementation of alternatives in toxicity testing.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Lethality Bioassay Using Artemia salina L.
09:09

Lethality Bioassay Using Artemia salina L.

Published on: October 11, 2022

13.0K

Non-animal Replacements for Acute Toxicity Testing.

Carol Barker-Treasure1, Kevin Coll2, Nathalie Belot1

  • 1XCellR8, Daresbury, UK.

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals : ATLA
|August 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new animal-free test using human cells to predict cosmetic ingredient toxicity. This in vitro method aims to replace current animal testing, offering a more human-relevant approach for safety assessments.

More Related Videos

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface
10:10

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: February 23, 2020

7.7K
Cytotoxicity Assays with Zebrafish Cell Lines
08:22

Cytotoxicity Assays with Zebrafish Cell Lines

Published on: January 6, 2023

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Lethality Bioassay Using Artemia salina L.
09:09

Lethality Bioassay Using Artemia salina L.

Published on: October 11, 2022

13.0K
Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface
10:10

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: February 23, 2020

7.7K
Cytotoxicity Assays with Zebrafish Cell Lines
08:22

Cytotoxicity Assays with Zebrafish Cell Lines

Published on: January 6, 2023

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • In Vitro Testing
  • Cosmetic Science

Background:

  • Current EU regulations, particularly REACH, mandate animal testing for cosmetic ingredient safety, using methods like LD50 with known limitations.
  • Existing in vitro assays, such as the 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) assay, show promise but still rely on animal-derived cells.
  • There is a critical need for validated, animal-free methods for predicting acute toxicity relevant to human health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel, animal-free in vitro test for predicting the acute toxicity of cosmetic ingredients in humans.
  • To establish a prediction model utilizing human-derived cells, independent of animal data.
  • To create a protocol that can replace current in vivo animal tests mandated by regulations.

Main Methods:

  • Incorporation of the NRU assay using human dermal fibroblasts cultured in animal product-free media.
  • Assessment of method robustness and reproducibility using sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) as a positive control.
  • Testing of five representative cosmetic ingredients (surfactant, preservative, fragrance, colour, emulsifier) to determine IC50 values, followed by expanded blind trials.

Main Results:

  • The method demonstrated robustness and reproducibility, yielding results analogous to the original animal cell-based NRU assay.
  • Initial testing of five cosmetic ingredients is underway, with range-finding and main experiments to generate IC50 values.
  • Early findings suggest the human cell-based test can potentially replace certain in vivo animal acute toxicity assessments for cosmetics.

Conclusions:

  • The developed in vitro protocol using human dermal fibroblasts shows significant potential as an animal-free alternative for acute toxicity testing of cosmetic ingredients.
  • This approach offers a more human-relevant prediction model, addressing the scientific deficiencies of current animal-based methods.
  • Further validation and expanded trials are expected to support the regulatory acceptance of this novel testing strategy.