Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

12:13
Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography
Published on: October 7, 2025
855
Motor cortex excitability is not differentially modulated following skill and strength training
M Leung1, T Rantalainen1, W-P Teo1
1Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Neuroscience
|August 12, 2015
Summary
Skill and metronome-paced strength training enhance neural plasticity in both motor cortices. Synchronized training modulates the ipsilateral motor cortex (iM1), suggesting it mediates neural cross-transfer.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Motor Learning
Background:
- Motor training, including skill and strength exercises, can alter neural activity in the primary motor cortex (M1).
- These changes include increased corticospinal excitability (CSE) and reduced short-latency intra-cortical inhibition (SICI).
- The capacity for neural mechanisms to transfer effects between motor cortices (cross-transfer) and modulate the ipsilateral M1 (iM1) is of significant interest.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether skill training and different types of strength training influence neural adaptations in both the contralateral (cM1) and ipsilateral (iM1) primary motor cortex.
- To determine if these training modalities promote cross-transfer of neural effects to the iM1.
Main Methods:
- Participants underwent unilateral arm training: visuomotor tracking (skill), metronome-paced strength training (MPST), self-paced strength training (SPST), or a control condition.
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure CSE and SICI in both cM1 and iM1 before and immediately after the training session.
Main Results:
- Skill training and MPST led to increased CSE and decreased SICI in both cM1 and iM1 compared to baseline.
- SPST and the control condition did not show significant changes in CSE or SICI.
- Compared to SPST and control, skill and MPST showed enhanced CSE and reduced SICI in cM1, and reduced SICI in iM1 post-training.
Conclusions:
- Skill training and MPST effectively modulate neural excitability and inhibition in both M1s.
- The findings suggest that training involving synchronization to external cues (auditory or visual) promotes neural adaptations in the iM1.
- These adaptations in the iM1 are likely responsible for mediating the observed neural cross-transfer effects.
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
4.9K
When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
4.9K
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
5.1K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
5.1K

