Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.9K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.9K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

687
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
687
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.7K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.7K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

578
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
578
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

2.7K
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
2.7K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

396
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
396

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Threat Level High: Ransomware a Bigger Threat.

Texas medicine·2021
Same author

Federal Fairness? Congressional Measure Addresses Out-of-Network Payments.

Texas medicine·2021
Same author

Shelter in a Storm: Liability Legislation Would Protect Physicians in Disaster.

Texas medicine·2021
Same author

Medicine Trains Its Sight on Scope Expansions.

Texas medicine·2021
Same author

Wrong Directive: Legal Shifts on End-of-Life Care Concern Physicians.

Texas medicine·2021
Same author

Outrageous Overreach Medicine Fights Broad Documentation Requests.

Texas medicine·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Fair Evaluations, No Witch Hunts.

Joey Berlin

    Texas Medicine
    |August 12, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Physicians now have enhanced legal protection against sham peer reviews. A Texas Supreme Court ruling safeguards doctors from reputational damage orchestrated by competitors or hospital administrators.

    More Related Videos

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
    05:47

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    1.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
    08:24

    The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

    Published on: August 25, 2023

    1.3K
    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
    05:47

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    1.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Legal Precedents in Healthcare

    Background:

    • Physicians can face reputational harm through peer review processes.
    • Allegations of "sham" peer review can be weaponized by competitors or hospital administrators.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the impact of a Texas Supreme Court decision on physician protection against "sham" peer review.
    • To understand how this ruling affects physicians targeted by malicious reputational attacks.

    Main Methods:

    • Legal case analysis of the Texas Supreme Court decision.
    • Review of potential implications for medical professionals and hospital governance.

    Main Results:

    • The Texas Supreme Court decision provides physicians with greater legal recourse against "sham" peer review.
    • This ruling offers protection for physicians whose reputations are targeted by business rivals or hospital management.

    Conclusions:

    • The court's decision strengthens safeguards for physicians against unfounded peer review actions.
    • This legal precedent is crucial for maintaining professional integrity and preventing targeted reputational damage in the medical field.