[Infection and molecular characteristics of Giardia in clinical diarrheal patients]
Objective:
To initially understand the infection status and the molecular characteristics of Giardia in clinical diarrheal patients.
Methods:
A total of 95 stool samples were collected from the clinical diarrheal patients admitted in a hospital in Shanghai from May to July, 2014, and the Giardia cysts in the samples were examined by an optical microscope. Then the tpi gene of Giardia in the positive samples were amplified by using the nested-PCR method, and the PCR products were sequenced and analyzed by using BLAST, ClustalX 1.83, and the phylogenetic tree was drawn by using MEGA6.0 software.
Results:
Only one patient was infected with Giardia and the positive detection rate was 1.05%. The Giardia cysts in the fecal specimen were seen clearly under the microscope. Through the identification by PCR, the amplified fragment was about 530 bp, and the sequencing analysis indicated it was Giardia and which was further identified as assemblage B by drawing phylogenetic tree based on tpi gene. Meanwhile, the sequence had 100% homology with the reported sequence from huian (KF271445).
Conclusions:
Giardia infection can occur in the clinical diarrheal patients. The study could provide more data for understanding the genetic characteristics of Giardia and the epidemiological study of giardiasis.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Gastroenteritis
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Diversity of Protists I
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.


