Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning to match patients to clinical trials using large language models.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2024
Same author

Effective matching of patients to clinical trials using entity extraction and neural re-ranking.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2023
Same author

Correction: On the usage of average Hausdorff distance for segmentation performance assessment: hidden error when used for ranking.

European radiology experimental·2022
Same author

Similarity Clustering for Representative Sets of Inorganic Solids for Density Functional Testing.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2021
Same author

Behavioral gender differences are reinforced during the COVID-19 crisis.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

An evaluation of performance measures for arterial brain vessel segmentation.

BMC medical imaging·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.1K

Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool.

Abdel Aziz Taha1, Allan Hanbury2

  • 1TU Wien, Institute of Software Technology and Interactive Systems, Favoritenstrasse 9-11, Vienna, A-1040, Austria. taha@ifs.tuwien.ac.at.

BMC Medical Imaging
|August 13, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an efficient open-source tool for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation. It offers 20 metrics and guidelines to help researchers select the best metrics for their specific segmentation tasks.

More Related Videos

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
06:48

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

9.6K
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
04:25

Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.1K
Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images
06:48

Automated Segmentation of Cortical Grey Matter from T1-Weighted MRI Images

Published on: January 7, 2019

9.6K
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
04:48

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical imaging
  • Image processing
  • Computer-aided diagnosis

Background:

  • Medical image segmentation is crucial for image processing and quality assessment.
  • Existing evaluation methods face challenges in metric selection, definition consistency, computational efficiency, and fuzzy segmentation support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the limitations of current medical image segmentation evaluation methods.
  • To provide a comprehensive and efficient tool for assessing segmentation quality.

Main Methods:

  • A literature review identified 20 relevant evaluation metrics for medical image segmentation.
  • Fuzzy definitions were developed for metrics to support fuzzy segmentation.
  • An efficient evaluation tool was developed and optimized for speed and memory usage.

Main Results:

  • An overview of 20 selected evaluation metrics, including fuzzy definitions, is presented.
  • A discussion on metric properties is provided to guide metric selection.
  • An efficient open-source tool implementing these metrics for large-scale 3D medical image volumes (e.g., MRI, CT) is proposed.

Conclusions:

  • An efficient evaluation tool for 3D medical image segmentation has been developed.
  • Guidelines for selecting appropriate metrics based on data and task are provided.
  • The tool supports 20 evaluation metrics and is optimized for performance.