Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Cost-effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume
Ashiya Khan, Abadan Khan Amitava1, Syed Ali Raza Rizvi
1Institute of Ophthalmology, JNMC, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Context:
Cost-effectiveness analysis should continually assess competing health care options especially in high volume environments like cataract surgery.
Aims:
To compare the cost effectiveness of phacoemulsification (PE) versus manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS).
Settings And Design:
Prospective randomized controlled trial. Tertiary care hospital setting.
Subjects And Methods:
A total of 52 consenting patients with age-related cataracts, were prospectively recruited, and block randomized to PE or MSICS group. Preoperative and postoperative LogMAR visual acuity (VA), visual function-14 (VF-14) score and their quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were obtained, and the change in their values calculated. These were divided by the total cost incurred in the surgery to calculate and compare the cost effectiveness and cost utility. Surgery duration was also compared.
Statistical Analysis Used:
Two group comparison with Student's t-test. Significance set at P < 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) quoted where appropriate.
Results:
Both the MSICS and PE groups achieved comparative outcomes in terms of change (difference in mean [95% CI]) in LogMAR VA (0.03 [-0.05-0.11]), VF-14 score (7.92 [-1.03-16.86]) and QALYs (1.14 [-0.89-3.16]). However, with significantly lower costs (INR 3228 [2700-3756]), MSICS was more cost effective, with superior cost utility value. MSICS was also significantly quicker (10.58 min [6.85-14.30]) than PE.
Conclusions:
MSICS provides comparable visual and QALY improvement, yet takes less time, and is significantly more cost-effective, compared with PE. Greater push and penetration of MSICS, by the government, is justifiably warranted in our country.
More Related Videos
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023
05:19Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Molecular Mechanisms in PCO and Fibrosis Following Cataract Surgery
Published on: December 1, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence