Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

1.4K
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
1.4K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

2.0K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
2.0K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

2.2K
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
2.2K
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab01:29

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab

812
AES is a powerful analytical technique, especially effective when used with plasma sources, producing abundant spectra in characteristic emission lines. The Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP), in particular, yields superior quantitative analytical data due to its high stability, low noise, low background, and minimal interferences under optimal experimental conditions. However, newer air-operated microwave sources are emerging as promising alternatives that could be more cost-effective than...
812
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

2.5K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
2.5K
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference01:30

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference

755
In atomic emission spectroscopy (AES), high-temperature atomizers excite a broad range of elements and molecules that generate complex emissions from sources such as oxides, hydroxides, and flame combustion products in the flame or plasma. Several strategies can be employed to minimize spectral interferences caused by overlapping emission lines or bands. These include increasing instrument resolution, choosing alternative emission lines, optimally placing the detector in low-background regions,...
755

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Current Legal Status of Drug Testing and Its Implications.

Forensic science review·2015
Same author

The identification of capsaicinoids in tear-gas spray.

Journal of forensic sciences·1982
Same author

Systematic analysis of explosive residues.

Journal of forensic sciences·1975
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.5K

Development in the Detection and Identification of Explosive Residues.

A D Beveridge1

  • 1Chemistry Section, Forensic Laboratory, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Forensic Science Review
|August 13, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Advances in analytical methods enhance explosives detection, especially for nitrated compounds. However, new inorganic explosives pose ongoing challenges for forensic analysis.

Keywords:
AnalysisX-ray powder diffractioncapillary zone electrophoresiscolor testsdetectiondynamiteelemental analysisemulsionexplosiveexplosive residuegas chromatographyhandswabhigh-performance liquid chromatographyidentificationimmunoassayimprovised explosive deviceinfrared spectroscopyion chromatographymass spectrometrynitraminenitrate esternuclear magnetic resonance spectrometryorganic gunshot residueorganic nitro compoundsplastic explosivepropellant powdersize exclusion chromatographyslurrysupercritical fluid chromatographythermal energy analysiswater gel

More Related Videos

Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives
07:22

Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives

Published on: April 10, 2017

10.0K
Preparation and Application of a New Bacterial Biosensor for the Presumptive Detection of Gunshot Residue
07:09

Preparation and Application of a New Bacterial Biosensor for the Presumptive Detection of Gunshot Residue

Published on: May 9, 2019

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 5, 2026

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector
07:57

Quantitative Detection of Trace Explosive Vapors by Programmed Temperature Desorption Gas Chromatography-Electron Capture Detector

Published on: July 25, 2014

20.5K
Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives
07:22

Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives

Published on: April 10, 2017

10.0K
Preparation and Application of a New Bacterial Biosensor for the Presumptive Detection of Gunshot Residue
07:09

Preparation and Application of a New Bacterial Biosensor for the Presumptive Detection of Gunshot Residue

Published on: May 9, 2019

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Recent decades show significant advancements in analytical instrument detectors, improving sensitivity and selectivity for explosives detection.
  • Improvements in cleanup and recovery procedures for explosive residues have been substantial.
  • Established methods with proven effectiveness in identifying explosive components in real-world residues have been integrated into systematic analysis protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review developments in traditional and novel analytical methods for unreacted explosives and residues.
  • To cross-reference explosive compounds with analytical methods applied to them, both as pure chemicals and in mixtures.
  • To focus on method combinations for systematic analysis and identification of residues from improvised explosive devices, handswabs, and gunshot residue.

Main Methods:

  • Review of traditional and novel analytical techniques for explosives and residues.
  • Cross-referencing of explosive compounds with specific analytical methods.
  • Focus on combined methods for residue analysis from various sources (IEDs, handswabs, gunshot residue).

Main Results:

  • Technology exists for positive identification of most unreacted explosives in residues.
  • No single method can detect all components of all explosives.
  • Greatest progress has been made with nitrated organic compounds.

Conclusions:

  • Well-equipped forensic laboratories with experienced scientists and comprehensive reference collections are crucial for accurate analysis.
  • Newer commercial explosives based on inorganic salts and non-nitrated organic compounds present ongoing analytical challenges.
  • Continued development of analytical methods is needed to address the evolving landscape of explosive formulations.